Close

Notes re: AT+T UNIX PC / 3B1 Reference Manual and Service Manual

paul-mcclayPaul McClay wrote 10/16/2026 at 06:36 • • 10 min read • Like

Once upon a millennium past, AT&T tried to put protected virtual memory and preemptive multiprocessing on desktops. The world was not yet ready.

AT&T UNIX PC a.k.a. PC 7300 a.k.a. 3B1 a.k.a. (Convergent) S/50 a.k.a. S4 a.k.a. Safari 4

photos from ---- [XX] show 3B1 variant with full-height hard drive bump under monitor
photos from oldcomputers.net [1] show 3B1 variant with boxy bump under monitor to make room for a full-height hard disk drive (scores of megabytes!)

This is mostly about the AT&T UNIX PC Reference Manual and AT&T UNIX PC Service Manual. It's all the result of one guy's brief fit of "research" and shouldn't be trusted. For brevity I'm just going to say stuff like it's true. Caveat lector.



Reference Manual



There are a few scans of the Reference Manual online.  The most useful is https://web.archive.org/web/20260928201015/https://6reoquestions.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com/misc/UnixPC/UNIXPC_Ref_ocred.pdf. [2]



About the Schematics...


After reading way too much of this [see notes generally but do you really want to go there?], I have some questions and a conjecture.

The D-08-00225-00 drawings for "S4, CPU P5 (1.0MB)" appear to be the most "evolved" or latest state of the main board while the "D-08-00222-00" drawings -- one of two sets titled "S4, CPU" -- reflect something closer to early production hardware.

I wonder if (Convergent for) AT&T produced any boards that could not have been configured for and stuffed with any of the 0.5MB/1MB/2MB RAM options. Maybe early boards allowed only 0.5MB or 2MB not 1MB. If so, I wonder if any later boards that added support for 1MB also removed support for 0.5MB. If any did, then I wonder if all did.

The May 1985 Byte article includes:

Main Memory
512K bytes of dynamic RAM with parity bit on motherboard,
currently expandable to 2 megabytes via expansion boards;
machine's design allows for a maximum of 4 megabytes
...
Optional Hardware
512K-byte expansion card, $1195

One of the priced configurations includes "1 megabyte of memory (includes 512K-byie expansion card)"

That indicates that 256Kbit chips were not yet commercially advertisable but were allowed for by design. Given the non-availability of 256Kbit chips, it does not indicate whether or not 1MB on board was possible. The D-08-00222-00 drawings fit that scenario.

Did AT&T sell non-3B1 UNIX PCs with 2MB on the main board? 1MB?

A 1985 3B1 spec sheet (presumably published after Byte went to print for May) offers "1 MB or 2 MB expandable to 4 MB". Appendix C of the Reference Manual says the only way to 4MB is starting w/2MB (I.e. no 0.5+1.5+2), so the memory options parse as 1MB or (2MB expandable to 4MB). That doesn't directly say 1MB 3B1s had 1MB on the main board, but silence about including expansion/consuming a slot and stuff I think I know because something somewhere indicate the 1MB 3B1 option had 1MB on the main board like D-08-00225-00 drawings. Assuming AT&T didn't corner themselves into requiring different PCBs to stuff with 1MB or 2MB, that indicates a board that could have been stuffed with 1MB or 2MB, which is likely what the D-08-00230-00 drawings were trying to depict, per note 27 on the first & 18th sheets. It doesn't indicate whether or not later/3B1 boards could have been configured for and stuffed with 64Kbit chips to build 0.5MB UNIX PCs.

Would (Convergent for) AT&T have cornered themselves into requiring different PCBs to build UNIX PCs (7300s) vs 3B1s? I doubt, especially when it would have been easy to not do that.

Maybe early 7300 PCBs had no provision for stuffing with 1MB. That would seem odd since AT&T offered, or at least wrote sales copy for 3B1s within the first year, so that option had to have been in the works. Could it be that the 7300/UNIX PC got pretty far along in development as a 0.5MB/2MB concept (the -00222- drawings) until the cry from sales folk for a middle option got loud enough and the development press-to-market got quiet enough to give someone motive and opportunity to spot an easy way to make a 1MB option? Might a new 1MB-capable moboard have been the real reason "3B1" came through the new product pipeline instead of just a top cover & power supply upgrade? Anyone with an early 7300/UNIXPC care to scrutinize the board to see if it could have been jumpered for and stuffed with 1MB?

Maybe late 3B1 PCBs had no provision for stuffing with 0.5MB (64Kbit chips). Anyone have a late 3B1 to examine? Between the "P5" title and differences from the -00222- drawings, I suppose the -00225- drawings represent a late or final revision of the board. Were any non-3B1 UNIX PCs made with "P5" boards?

Anyhow, here's my conjecture:

At least some boards could have been configured for and stuffed with any of the three on-board memory configurations. Plausibly some early boards didn't support 1MB. Possibly the last boards gave up the 0.5MB option, but I doubt that.

The -00230- drawings include both 'note 27' re populating with 1MB or 2MB, and 'note 10' (and JR1 on sheet 18) re populating with 0.5MB or 2MB. If the -00230- drawings were believable, that would indicate intent to accommodate all RAM options. I think 'note 27' says pretty clearly that someone at some point thought there should be boards that accept both 1MB & 2MB.

In the -00225- drawings for a 1MB machine, which really means a machine with only two banks of RAM instead of four banks (of low or high density chips for 0.5MB or 2MB):

So I think it's likely that the -00225- / "P5 (1.0 MB)" schematic artificially omits memory config options from the drawings that are actually available on P5 boards, and probably on any board that was or could have been populated with 1MB, and possibly on all production boards, or all but the earliest.

To "complete" the -00225- drawings by undoing over-focus on the 1MB configuration, I think it's likely that these changes would match real hardware:



Service Manual


The Service Manual is also available online at: https://web.archive.org/web/20240609125007/https://6reoquestions.com/misc/S50/S50_Service_Manual.pdf

That's the straight-up AT&T UNIX™ PC Service Manual in a Convergent suit.

Outside:

Inside:

This might be news. At time of writing, I don't find any mention of an available scan of the Service Manual in the 3B1/UNIX-PC world.

AJ, who OCR'd the Reference Manual, posted a link to this scan in one of his relevant blogs: https://mightyframe.blogspot.com/2018/01/convergent-technologies-branded-model.html and further clarified in email "The buyer of the S/50 scanned the manual and shared it with me."

If you didn't already know: Convergent Technologies, Inc. designed and manufactured these machines for AT&T, and sold a few under their own name with nearly all of the AT&T branding intact under a very thin "S/50" veneer. Conversely, the AT&T Reference Manual includes clear "Convergent" branding on the schematics.



Notes


Notes, referenced by [square brackets], appear on the next "Page". Because this rabbit hole went deeper than HaD's max Page length.

Like

Discussions