The initial project description reads like a solution looking for a problem. Even if the project actually evolved that way (and it did), then it does not mean that is the best way to present the project. Mmm...what to do? Perhaps split into 2 projects, with one describing the RB3DP and the other describing the use of the RB3DP to make buildings using stabilised dirt as the construction material.

I am thinking that trying to fit everything into one project description can confuse more than illuminate. I am still mulling it over, but what do you think? Suggestions are welcome.

RigTig (Matt)