Why do you even put a 69Mpix picture when it will be scaled down to 7% by the browser ?
The HaD page layout limits the displayed width anyway, it's useless to put hi-res data on the logs or pages... 800px wide is a reasonable width, I usually do 600 or 700px so it displays everywhere nicely. Except the banners, 1500px but only 400 or 500px high.
On my old computer, careless users could crash my computer just with an insanely high resolution picture. It irks me.
Yah never know who's in on the planned-obsolescence game! Heck, they might not even know.
Oh, and, according to some, these days, the "rule of the web" is that whatever you put up has to work on a phone-screen first-and-foremost. I call 'em AtEase-users, but, yahknow, different-strokes-for-different-folks, I guess.
I find it most-offensive that my browser's capable of taking over my computer to that extent! What is this, the Pre-emptive multitasking-era, revisited? I literally had to push the Power Button to get a response... even CTRL-ALT-DEL didn't!
It seems to be a resolution / compression thing. These are ~200Kb files each but 8775x7927 resolution (they have been autogenerated). DEFLATE does a great job at compressing them, but I guess there are no guarantees there will be enough resources to actually render on the client side after the decompress.
I am wondering if there's a "black square" type of attack here somewhere? Might give it a try on Facebook ;)
hah, I thought maybe there was a bit of "attack" going on here... Not sure I want to share my browser-info with yah, now ;) Let's just say we're working on a P4 with 2G RAM, but the RAM/swap usage doesn't seem to increase too dramatically, 'bout 1G RAM-usage, 250MB SWAP.
Am shocked it's capable of slowing down the entire system, rather than being relegated to the browser itself... maybe I've got to adjust its "niceness".
Oh, there's more than one image, here? I only ever get the first.
Is there something funky about that first image...? When I scroll upon this update in my feed, the whole computer starts stuttering, quite dramatically for seconds at a time; mouse-movement/clicks, even the activity-monitor stalls. But only when I scroll upon this update in my newsfeed, or open this page.
Aleksandar Bradic
Discussions
Become a Hackaday.io Member
Create an account to leave a comment. Already have an account? Log In.
Rule of the web : be nice to all the viewers.
Why do you even put a 69Mpix picture when it will be scaled down to 7% by the browser ?
The HaD page layout limits the displayed width anyway, it's useless to put hi-res data on the logs or pages... 800px wide is a reasonable width, I usually do 600 or 700px so it displays everywhere nicely. Except the banners, 1500px but only 400 or 500px high.
On my old computer, careless users could crash my computer just with an insanely high resolution picture. It irks me.
Are you sure? yes | no
Yah never know who's in on the planned-obsolescence game! Heck, they might not even know.
Oh, and, according to some, these days, the "rule of the web" is that whatever you put up has to work on a phone-screen first-and-foremost. I call 'em AtEase-users, but, yahknow, different-strokes-for-different-folks, I guess.
I find it most-offensive that my browser's capable of taking over my computer to that extent! What is this, the Pre-emptive multitasking-era, revisited? I literally had to push the Power Button to get a response... even CTRL-ALT-DEL didn't!
Are you sure? yes | no
I totallyly agree.
Are you sure? yes | no
It seems to be a resolution / compression thing. These are ~200Kb files each but 8775x7927 resolution (they have been autogenerated). DEFLATE does a great job at compressing them, but I guess there are no guarantees there will be enough resources to actually render on the client side after the decompress.
I am wondering if there's a "black square" type of attack here somewhere? Might give it a try on Facebook ;)
Are you sure? yes | no
hah, I thought maybe there was a bit of "attack" going on here... Not sure I want to share my browser-info with yah, now ;) Let's just say we're working on a P4 with 2G RAM, but the RAM/swap usage doesn't seem to increase too dramatically, 'bout 1G RAM-usage, 250MB SWAP.
Am shocked it's capable of slowing down the entire system, rather than being relegated to the browser itself... maybe I've got to adjust its "niceness".
Oh, there's more than one image, here? I only ever get the first.
Are you sure? yes | no
That's weird (and interesting ;) )What browser are you using?
Are you sure? yes | no
Is there something funky about that first image...? When I scroll upon this update in my feed, the whole computer starts stuttering, quite dramatically for seconds at a time; mouse-movement/clicks, even the activity-monitor stalls. But only when I scroll upon this update in my newsfeed, or open this page.
Are you sure? yes | no