Close

Disappointing, but Not Unexpected

A project log for Gammaclock

Clock with a radioactive timebase

dave-ehnebuskeDave Ehnebuske 06/02/2018 at 18:180 Comments

Well, I've now logged how many clicks my Geiger counter saw each minute since some time on May 20. It's more than clear that the click rate is falling gradually. When I first became suspicious a while back, the rate was about 50 clicks per second and now it's about 45. The radioactive source I'm using is the little dot of 226Ra stuck right up next to the GM tube that I've used for some time now. Here's the data:

As with earlier charts, the blue line is the average of the whole run up to that point and the red line is an exponentially decaying moving average with a decay period of an hour -- a measure of the behavior during the previous hour. For my purpose -- building a timebase -- this is not good at all.

I'm relatively certain the problem is with the long-term stability of my Geiger counter, not the physical setup or the radioactive source. It's still possible, I suppose, that there's an environmental problem (e.g. variability due to Rn), though there's no obvious diurnal pattern to the data or correlation that I can see with the weather.

Time, I think, to look into a different (type of) detector to see how it behaves over time. I need to do some research on the alternatives.

Discussions