After running my last test I had some unexplained results where running 4 passes cut less deep than 3 passes. This is not the first time this has happened, and I don't think I can blame it on a measurement error. Anyway to try and dig a bit deeper into this I wrote a script to cut a 20 mm line at 100 mm/min and 80% power on my 30 w NEJE laser. The script cuts the same exact line over and over again, each spaced 2 mm apart. By measuring the depth of cut of each line we can see how much variation there is.
![](https://cdn.hackaday.io/images/797631628998702837.jpg)
One idea I had was that the laser was heating up and loosing power when running the same cut back to back. I happened to have a temperature data logger that I made from an old Arduino a while ago, so I pulled it out and strapped one of the temperature probes to the front of the laser.
![](https://cdn.hackaday.io/images/1246491628998848307.jpg)
You can see from the above plot that the temperature rises from room temperature (28C or 82F) to 37 C (99F) after 5 minutes of continuous operation. I let the thermometer continue to log after the job finished, it took another 5 minutes or so for the laser to cool back down to something approaching room temperature. It would probably be best to run the fan for at least 5 minutes after finishing a job so the laser can cool down quickly.
![](https://cdn.hackaday.io/images/8933731628999161922.jpg)
I measured the depth of cut of all 100 lines and came up with the results below. The max variance between the deepest and shallowest cut was about 25% and there seems to be an inverse correlation between the temperature of the diode and the depth of cut. It is clear that there is quite a lot of variance between cuts, and that the laser looses power as it heats up, but I don't think it is enough to explain the fact that 3 passes produces a noticeably deeper cut than 4 passes. In some cases the difference was almost 2 mm!
Discussions
Become a Hackaday.io Member
Create an account to leave a comment. Already have an account? Log In.