The Ender 3 came in at 322W when starting up & 60W when printing PLA with a 50C bed & 230C nozzle. The power supply was only rated for 300W. When heating the bed & nozzle simultaneously, it dumps the full output & probably browns out.
This brings up the question of how practical a 300x300mm bed is. Even if the print is 10x10mm, the entire bed has to be heated. So if you're paying for electricity instead of using solar panels, you'd need a smaller printer for smaller prints & a bigger printer for bigger prints. If electricity is unlimited, you could use a bigger printer full time.
Printing TPU with a 260C nozzle & no bed heating burns 65W. 10 hours of printing burned 0.650kW hours.
The idle printer burns 7W. With the motors on, it burns 22W. Motors + 260C nozzle heating burns 65W. Motors + 260C nozzle + 65C bed heating burns 330W as the worst case PETG setting. Once at steady state, it oscillates between 65W & 300W with the worst case PETG temperature settings. 300W seems to happen when the bed is heating. The nozzle heating seems to be proportional while the bed heating is binary & sucks most of the power.
Discussions
Become a Hackaday.io Member
Create an account to leave a comment. Already have an account? Log In.
The power usage study of the Ender 3 highlights the practical considerations for 3D printing with different materials and bed sizes. For instance, the printer's power consumption varies significantly based on the nozzle and bed temperatures, raising questions about the efficiency of larger print beds. This analysis reminds me of how meticulous details are crucial in academic projects as the one I work for. I decided to click now at https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/top-5-college-admission-essay-writing-services-ifo9e/ and find help online. The power usage must be optimized for 3D printing. Balancing power and efficiency is key in both fields.
Are you sure? yes | no