data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/00e19/00e197f49ecb10516f4b8bb0bcc6d7e48a21f682" alt=""
From another point of view, close to the red super moon raising axis I'd like to shoot for my son's birthday (he's in Japan and can't see it).
There's again a lot of wind, but I'm beginning to like that lens a lot, it gives incredible compression of the space.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9c1f5/9c1f52a3e5544ba3a923892920979ecc820c1103" alt=""
Ok, there's so much wind that the crane's been moving, so I had to adapt my frame.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f1019/f1019b51f23e9c84a6007ab88081631d34195c8e" alt=""
For the speed, it's good, but there's a blurry trouble.
I finally had to go inside as the firs rain in a month arrived just for the raising moon schedule.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c548e/c548e118ecf744b3a27612a139f55e325d83f795" alt=""
Next day, from inside, the air is clean, the grey thing on the front is at between 1 and 2 km, the white building behind is at about 2,5 km, the television tower is at around 9 km, and the buildings on the back, I didn't even know I could see something that far.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/888f1/888f1b3f2f91b3bdd7397c7b5fbdacbf0986a8ea" alt=""
This is at about 1 km from home.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b1ddc/b1ddc40d67a60737ae4be18c0eb4bc1953a77286" alt=""
Same shot, different lens aperture.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1f36a/1f36ab065e3a7c9b28cdfd8c6499f165f983660c" alt=""
That's not even the fastest speed of the homemade shutter, so I sure can take picture in bright daylight now.
There's still that blurry trouble, I suspect a bounce back of the rear of the build, where the camera is mounted, when the bungee's released, the movement is very fast and stops : there are clearly 2 images, one is slightly less exposed (lighter) and another nearly well exposed (darker), it's not a blurry line.
The rear end isn't fixed at all on anything, it just lies on a square aluminium tube mounted on a tripod.
It's for sure easier to manipulate to aim, but it must be tightly fastened when taking a picture : easy fix.
And, all those tests have been made with an Olympus digital camera which sensor size is 24 x times smaller than the 4 x 5 " film that feeds the film camera.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/96259/96259070a25a4c50e1df1e94a669e7e515e0e700" alt=""
This is from the Olympus.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2734b/2734b5fd7672d67ec22de6b722af8e5b3706149a" alt=""
This is what the image is going to be on film.
So I'm very optimistic about the blur. Of course the rear end must be fastened, and then I can make more tests, with B & W films loaded for the first time in more than 30 years : it's cheaper and more convenient to process, and also the lens has some optical characteristics that can be very interesting in B & W.
I think it's some kind of requirement for a lens shooting from above, at a far distance, to have a very small dynamic range : when looking at the histogram, in the viewfinder when shooting, to have the best exposure, and in the raw developing software, it's very narrow :
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/918ee/918ee2f3afb637c08012fea90ca61e123ceff6e8" alt=""
This is the unprocessed file, no risk of highlights clipping or too dark shadows.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c6db8/c6db86a07ab6e0e5c8034714b8b81f2977d1ca11" alt=""
Same camera, cheap (but not bad) zoom lens, the histogram is much wider.
Discussions
Become a Hackaday.io Member
Create an account to leave a comment. Already have an account? Log In.