Description and requirements
- Initially, the task was to be able to use open Wi-Fi networks that are placed far away and have weak signal levels.
- The antenna either should have been small or portable or could be assembled/disassembled.
- F=2.45 GHz but possibly also F=5..6 GHz. Wi-Fi and Bluetooth should be covered.
- The receiver should not be placed so far away from the antenna for practical use. Focus distance r=50 cm for 2.45 GHz. r=120 cm for 5.9 GHz.
- The diameter of the antenna should be no more than 70cm for practical use. D=70cm.
- We assume that the source is placed at an infinite distance.
- The antenna design is a metal ring with an external radius = of 0.35m and an internal radius = of 0.247m.
- Not tested with a real Wi-Fi signal yet, only spectrum analyzer result so far.
Fresnel zone antenna
- During simulation, it found that for focus distance f=50 cm and diameter of antenna D=70cm, the optimal gain is achieved using only shielding (shading) second Fresnel zone.
- Thus, all zones are open except the second one.
- Such configuration can give an amplitude gain 3.0 (9.5 dB).
Vector diagram for gain calculation:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0944a/0944a44aa12247d3bb6bde152966acf135da4826" alt=""
Calculation
For 2.45 Ghz
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5bc63/5bc63c1706558a5fe900d4dd0753152861137f4c" alt=""
For 5.5GHz
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/733f5/733f5df5a2e6b24fcfb00215bdea413334fee856" alt=""
Simulation
Setup
- OptiFDTD simulation SW, https://optiwave.com/resources/academia/free-fdtd-download/
- OptiFDTD gives the result in DFT (digital Fourier transform).
Simulation setup in optiFDTD:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/87277/87277df367dd3fbee6c7cb2edf9dfae854766e66" alt=""
Simulation setup in optiFDTD with plane wave source:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c9d97/c9d97f50ec65cff54c3b51ae68499b49cb3f2eda" alt=""
Results – plane incident wave
F=2.45GHz
Result at receiver:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/349d7/349d79cadec6a81b69ca7cff66b45524825c1b0d" alt=""
Result along the Z-axis:
Field magnitude along the Z-axis:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/afc3c/afc3c7ad13f132e3c4c871e04e2acfd99116c3c5" alt=""
Peak position around f=46mm (96mm-50mm):
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a50ae/a50aeb51e52f57af0a73b6b564640243c36fbd28" alt=""
Conclusion
- A gain of around 2.8 (9.0 dB) can be expected for F=2.45GHz.
- For F=2.45GHz focus distance f=46 mm where the field is maximum.
F=2.45GHz with the presence of a tablet pc or smartphone at the focus
Setup with the presence of a tablet pc at the focus:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/dfbc3/dfbc3960d3752457c340d533315183b90840959e" alt=""
Simulation with the presence of a smartphone or tablet pc at the focus:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a68c2/a68c2f186043d768b8eae651c15fc56774ee17d8" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/32ab9/32ab9985016caf1281930bb32c3f26412622dd9d" alt=""
Conclusion
- Seems like presence of smartphone/tablet pc does not affect the gain a lot.
- Some standing waves can be seen at the antenna of the receiver but the field strength is still high.
- Should be tested with the spectrum analyzer.
F=5.9 GHz
Result along the Z-axis:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6697e/6697e678ff6d5218ecf261d295e5b1b2fc65e4e9" alt=""
Field magnitude along the Z-axis:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/aa46b/aa46b8c0e70164dbb1a22cd46eb1ab9d01031de3" alt=""
Conclusion
- A gain of around 2.8 (9.0 dB) can be expected for F=5.9GHz.
- For F=5.9 GHz focus distance f=120+ mm where the field is maximum.
Results – simulation with the point source at the far field
Setup
Setup with points source:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d9ba/6d9ba05912d9a0b150a8e15629d8b0423f55897a" alt=""
F=2.45 Ghz
Comparison at a far distance and point source simulation:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/01930/01930103215d80aa21f9dea1f6e3fa5381f46e9b" alt=""
Far-field comparison without and with antenna:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2c920/2c920dd0b53677f26228de4d57af528a14c35c00" alt=""
Far-field comparison without and with antenna:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/30f86/30f8659a0b86a5086584857350c4b625bcb57a40" alt=""
Conclusion
- A gain of around 2.8 (9.0 dB) can also be seen with far-field simulation.
- It also proves that the antenna will work in both modes: receiver and transmitter. It is also theoretically proved by the reciprocity principle.
PCB design
- Thus, the antenna design is a metal ring with an external radius = 0.35m and an internal radius = 0.247m.
- For portability, the ring is split into 8 pieces, so the antenna can be assembled and disassembled.
- PCB design has only one metal layer (TOP).
PCB design:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0d249/0d249bcaca49204f68f3037882aaea837359be8f" alt=""
Assembly
- Parts should be connected using interleaving – one part normal, one part upside down,
- In this case, the metal layers (TOP) touch each other directly.
- Such a connection also helps to compensate for the curvature of each PCB.
Two parts connection:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d71cd/d71cd82284cd066e269a78a72929d91187b32442" alt=""
Antenna assembled:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7efa7/7efa77a8a736dc5209642ea917ad275178fac57b" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d62e7/d62e78ef8021b4c8ac96a2d0d65f11e03e64a030" alt=""
Test results
Setup
- Beacon with spread spectrum as a source at the distance of about 40m.
- Loop H near field probe as a receiver.
- FLP1003 spectrum analyzer.
Measurement at receiver point:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/282c6/282c60b43a5375c5b70abc99e0661fca77a982ad" alt=""
Measurement results
- The following pictures show difference with and without the antenna presented.
- Case with antenna shows a higher signal level (5...10 dB gain).
- Receiving probe moved +-5cm from r=50.0 cm.
Measurement at spectrum analyzer:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/af1ef/af1efcd23e86acd7d037c34d7e7b64a1281bc3eb" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/01195/01195a5a45f9e1b76c53276093dd8aff44f1cb16" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/41ab5/41ab5df5221e65b44a6c811d8a40268a26d64cfb" alt=""
Conclusion
- The presented antenna can theoretically be used as an antenna for WiFi and Bluetooth.
- Seems like antenna gain is close to simulated (9.0dB) and measured as 5...10 dB.
- Should be measured with real weak WiFi signal receiving.
Notes on practical using
- The source of the signal (WiFi or Bluetooth) should be known.
- The placement of the antenna on the tablet PC or smartphone should be known.
- Around the antenna, there should be some space free of obstacles to avoid shading of the rest of the Fresnel zones.