Close
0%
0%

Experimental Verification of the NKTg Law Using NA

SCIENTIFIC CONCLUSION
On the experimental verification of the NKTg Law on planetary orbits
Abstract: This report presents the results of the

Similar projects worth following
0 followers
SCIENTIFIC CONCLUSION
On the experimental verification of the NKTg Law on planetary orbits
Abstract: This report presents the results of the experimental verification of the NKTg law through the simulation of Mercury’s orbit in 2025, using reference data from NASA JPL Horizons and the MESSENGER spacecraft.
1. Conservation of motion tendency through the quantity NKTg₁
The study confirms that the quantity NKTg₁ = x × p (the product of position and momentum) is the fundamental parameter determining the motion tendency of an object in space. The experimental results show that:
• Establishing NKTg₁ = x × p as a target constant (8.90E+38 NKTm) allows the prediction of orbital velocity with high accuracy, with an average relative error of only 1.3% compared to NASA data.
• The interaction between position (x) and momentum (p) self-adjusts to maintain this constant, enabling the object to preserve its motion structure and maintain a stable state without the need for external force parame

Experimental Verification of the NKTg Law Using NASA Mercury Data in 2025

Independent researcher:  Nguyễn Khánh Tùng  

ORCID: 0009-0002-9877-4137

Experimental-Verification-of-the-NKTg-Law-Using-NASA-Mercury-Data-in-2025 SHA256 821e9b5a21fd4c7e24351cc55f2a2003a9d50489a9ff07de630ceb2250aa9417.pdf

Experimental Verification of the NKTg Law Using NASA Mercury Data in 2025

Adobe Portable Document Format - 608.91 kB - 02/27/2026 at 14:36

Preview

  • 1 × Position × Momentum → NKTg₁ = x × (m × v)

  • Experimental Verification of the NKTg Law Using NASA Mercury Data in 2025

    Nguyen Khanh Tung3 hours ago 0 comments

    Experimental Verification of the NKTg Law Using NASA Mercury Data in 2025

    Independent researcher: Nguyễn Khánh Tùng

    ORCID: 0009-0002-9877-4137

    ```

    Table 1 – Actual orbital and mass data of Mercury in 2024

    Thời điểm x (m) v (m/s) m (kg) p = m·v

    1/1/2024 5.16E+10 5.33E+04 3.30E+23 1.76E+28

    4/1/2024 6.97E+10 3.90E+04 3.30E+23 1.29E+28

    7/1/2024 5.36E+10 5.20E+04 3.30E+23 1.72E+28

    10/1/2024 6.95E+10 3.92E+04 3.30E+23 1.30E+28

    12/31/2024 4.64E+10 5.81E+04 3.30E+23 1.92E+28

    ```

    Table 2 – Simulated orbital and mass data of Mercury in 2025 according to the NKTg law

    Thời điểm x (m) v (m/s) m (kg) p = m·v (kg·m/s)

    1/1/2025 5.16E+10 5.22E+04 3.301E+23 1.72E+28

    4/1/2025 6.97E+10 3.87E+04 3.301E+23 1.28E+28

    7/1/2025 5.49E+10 4.91E+04 3.301E+23 1.62E+28

    10/1/2025 6.83E+10 3.95E+04 3.301E+23 1.30E+28

    12/31/2025 4.61E+10 5.85E+04 3.301E+23 1.93E+28

    Table 3 – Actual orbital and mass data of Mercury in 2025 from the NASA JPL Horizons System

    Thời điểm x (m) v (m/s) m (kg)

    1/1/2025 5.16E+10 5.34E+04 3.30E+23

    4/1/2025 6.97E+10 3.89E+04 3.30E+23

    7/1/2025 5.49E+10 5.04E+04 3.30E+23

    1/10/2025 6.83E+10 3.98E+04 3.30E+23

    12/31/2025 4.61E+10 5.89E+04 3.30E+23

    Table 4 – Comparison between NKTg Simulation and NASA Data in 2025

    Thời điểm v – NKTg v – NASA Sai lệch v tương đối (%)

    1/1/2025 5.22E+04 53400 -2.15461

    4/1/2025 3.87E+04 38900 -0.562786

    7/1/2025 4.91E+04 50400 -2.561981

    1/10/2025 3.95E+04 39800 -0.819213

    12/31/2025 5.85E+04 58900 -0.707806

    SCIENTIFIC CONCLUSION
    On the experimental verification of the NKTg Law on planetary orbits

    Abstract: This report presents the results of the experimental verification of the NKTg law through the simulation of Mercury’s orbit in 2025, using reference data from NASA JPL Horizons and the MESSENGER spacecraft.

    1. Conservation of motion tendency through the quantity NKTg₁
    The study confirms that the quantity NKTg₁ = x × p (the product of position and momentum) is the fundamental parameter determining the motion tendency of an object in space. The experimental results show that:

    • Establishing NKTg₁ = x × p as a target constant (8.90E+38 NKTm) allows the prediction of orbital velocity with high accuracy, with an average relative error of only 1.3% compared to NASA data.
    • The interaction between position (x) and momentum (p) self-adjusts to maintain this constant, enabling the object to preserve its motion structure and maintain a stable state without the need for external force parameters.

    2. Experimental verification of mass variation (dm/dt) from MESSENGER data
    The model integrates the actual mass variation coefficient dm/dt = -0.5 kg/s, established from measured data of the atmospheric escape phenomenon by the MESSENGER spacecraft. According to the NKTg law, this variation leads to:

    • The formation of the quantity NKTg₂: The product of the rate of mass change and momentum (NKTg₂ = (dm/dt) × p) carries a negative value throughout the orbit.
    • Resisting effect: The negative value of NKTg₂ confirms that the mass loss process plays a resisting role against changes in the state of motion, accurately reflecting the nature of varying inertia.

    3. Consistency and applicability
    The experimental results on Mercury confirm that the NKTg law has consistency and high applicability. The system demonstrates the capability to:

    • Fully describe planetary dynamics solely through the interaction between fundamental quantities (x, v, m).
    • Eliminate dependence on approximation methods, without using force expressions in the calculation process, ensuring the reproducibility of results across different computational platforms.

View project log

  • 1
    Data

    ```

    Table 1 – Actual orbital and mass data of Mercury in 2024

    Thời điểm x (m) v (m/s) m (kg) p = m·v

    1/1/2024 5.16E+10 5.33E+04 3.30E+23 1.76E+28

    4/1/2024 6.97E+10 3.90E+04 3.30E+23 1.29E+28

    7/1/2024 5.36E+10 5.20E+04 3.30E+23 1.72E+28

    10/1/2024 6.95E+10 3.92E+04 3.30E+23 1.30E+28

    12/31/2024 4.64E+10 5.81E+04 3.30E+23 1.92E+28

    ```

    Table 2 – Simulated orbital and mass data of Mercury in 2025 according to the NKTg law

    Thời điểm x (m) v (m/s) m (kg) p = m·v (kg·m/s)

    1/1/2025 5.16E+10 5.22E+04 3.301E+23 1.72E+28

    4/1/2025 6.97E+10 3.87E+04 3.301E+23 1.28E+28

    7/1/2025 5.49E+10 4.91E+04 3.301E+23 1.62E+28

    10/1/2025 6.83E+10 3.95E+04 3.301E+23 1.30E+28

    12/31/2025 4.61E+10 5.85E+04 3.301E+23 1.93E+28

    Table 3 – Actual orbital and mass data of Mercury in 2025 from the NASA JPL Horizons System

    Thời điểm x (m) v (m/s) m (kg)

    1/1/2025 5.16E+10 5.34E+04 3.30E+23

    4/1/2025 6.97E+10 3.89E+04 3.30E+23

    7/1/2025 5.49E+10 5.04E+04 3.30E+23

    1/10/2025 6.83E+10 3.98E+04 3.30E+23

    12/31/2025 4.61E+10 5.89E+04 3.30E+23

    Table 4 – Comparison between NKTg Simulation and NASA Data in 2025

    Thời điểm v – NKTg v – NASA Sai lệch v tương đối (%)

    1/1/2025 5.22E+04 53400 -2.15461

    4/1/2025 3.87E+04 38900 -0.562786

    7/1/2025 4.91E+04 50400 -2.561981

    1/10/2025 3.95E+04 39800 -0.819213

    12/31/2025 5.85E+04 58900 -0.707806

View all instructions

Enjoy this project?

Share

Discussions

Nguyen Khanh Tung wrote 3 hours ago point

Experimental Verification of the NKTg Law Using NASA Mercury Data in 2025

Independent researcher: Nguyễn Khánh Tùng

ORCID: 0009-0002-9877-4137

```

Table 1 – Actual orbital and mass data of Mercury in 2024

Thời điểm x (m) v (m/s) m (kg) p = m·v

1/1/2024 5.16E+10 5.33E+04 3.30E+23 1.76E+28

4/1/2024 6.97E+10 3.90E+04 3.30E+23 1.29E+28

7/1/2024 5.36E+10 5.20E+04 3.30E+23 1.72E+28

10/1/2024 6.95E+10 3.92E+04 3.30E+23 1.30E+28

12/31/2024 4.64E+10 5.81E+04 3.30E+23 1.92E+28

```

Table 2 – Simulated orbital and mass data of Mercury in 2025 according to the NKTg law

Thời điểm x (m) v (m/s) m (kg) p = m·v (kg·m/s)

1/1/2025 5.16E+10 5.22E+04 3.301E+23 1.72E+28

4/1/2025 6.97E+10 3.87E+04 3.301E+23 1.28E+28

7/1/2025 5.49E+10 4.91E+04 3.301E+23 1.62E+28

10/1/2025 6.83E+10 3.95E+04 3.301E+23 1.30E+28

12/31/2025 4.61E+10 5.85E+04 3.301E+23 1.93E+28

Table 3 – Actual orbital and mass data of Mercury in 2025 from the NASA JPL Horizons System

Thời điểm x (m) v (m/s) m (kg)

1/1/2025 5.16E+10 5.34E+04 3.30E+23

4/1/2025 6.97E+10 3.89E+04 3.30E+23

7/1/2025 5.49E+10 5.04E+04 3.30E+23

1/10/2025 6.83E+10 3.98E+04 3.30E+23

12/31/2025 4.61E+10 5.89E+04 3.30E+23

Table 4 – Comparison between NKTg Simulation and NASA Data in 2025

Thời điểm v – NKTg v – NASA Sai lệch v tương đối (%)

1/1/2025 5.22E+04 53400 -2.15461

4/1/2025 3.87E+04 38900 -0.562786

7/1/2025 4.91E+04 50400 -2.561981

1/10/2025 3.95E+04 39800 -0.819213

12/31/2025 5.85E+04 58900 -0.707806

SCIENTIFIC CONCLUSION
On the experimental verification of the NKTg Law on planetary orbits

Abstract: This report presents the results of the experimental verification of the NKTg law through the simulation of Mercury’s orbit in 2025, using reference data from NASA JPL Horizons and the MESSENGER spacecraft.

1. Conservation of motion tendency through the quantity NKTg₁
The study confirms that the quantity NKTg₁ = x × p (the product of position and momentum) is the fundamental parameter determining the motion tendency of an object in space. The experimental results show that:

• Establishing NKTg₁ = x × p as a target constant (8.90E+38 NKTm) allows the prediction of orbital velocity with high accuracy, with an average relative error of only 1.3% compared to NASA data.
• The interaction between position (x) and momentum (p) self-adjusts to maintain this constant, enabling the object to preserve its motion structure and maintain a stable state without the need for external force parameters.

2. Experimental verification of mass variation (dm/dt) from MESSENGER data
The model integrates the actual mass variation coefficient dm/dt = -0.5 kg/s, established from measured data of the atmospheric escape phenomenon by the MESSENGER spacecraft. According to the NKTg law, this variation leads to:

• The formation of the quantity NKTg₂: The product of the rate of mass change and momentum (NKTg₂ = (dm/dt) × p) carries a negative value throughout the orbit.
• Resisting effect: The negative value of NKTg₂ confirms that the mass loss process plays a resisting role against changes in the state of motion, accurately reflecting the nature of varying inertia.

3. Consistency and applicability
The experimental results on Mercury confirm that the NKTg law has consistency and high applicability. The system demonstrates the capability to:

• Fully describe planetary dynamics solely through the interaction between fundamental quantities (x, v, m).
• Eliminate dependence on approximation methods, without using force expressions in the calculation process, ensuring the reproducibility of results across different computational platforms.

  Are you sure? yes | no

Does this project spark your interest?

Become a member to follow this project and never miss any updates