==============================================================================

CYR PIVOT-FIELD GENERATOR

Hackaday.io — Digikey Green Powered Challenge

Submitted: March 19, 2026

Author: Alan Cyr / Wolf13 · CYR Technologies · Chicago, IL

FINAL ARCHITECTURE — No further mechanism changes anticipated

==============================================================================

PROJECT OVERVIEW

----------------

A cog-bypass mechanism for rotating permanent magnet generators that recovers

3-8% of output currently wasted overcoming magnetic alignment (cogging) torque.

Two variants documented: Individual Pivot Holder and Ring Axial Travel.

Core principle: extract at the phi offset (38.17° before stator pole dead

center) where peak EMF occurs naturally — not at dead center where cog force

peaks. The field does all the work. The cam is only the trigger. The groove

is the seatbelt.

This generator upgrade completes the CYR three-device zero-fuel grid:

  Device 1: CYR Tidal Pulse Tower (181.2 kW base → ~186-196 kW)

  Device 2: CYR Hourglass Gravity (178 kW base → ~183-185 kW)

  Device 3: CYR Pivot-Field Generator (the coupling that improves both)

FINAL GEOMETRY — ALL FIXED MAGNETS INSIDE

------------------------------------------

All fixed positioning magnets are located INSIDE the rotating wheel —

between the hub and the active magnets. NO magnets on the outer housing

wall. The wheel assembly is entirely self-contained.

  + PUSH MAGNET (inside wheel, at phi offset angular position):

    North pole faces inner face of active magnet.

    N→N repulsion PUSHES active magnet OUTWARD toward stator.

    Result: minimum gap · maximum coupling · peak EMF captured.

  − PULL MAGNET (inside wheel, at dead center angular position):

    South pole faces inner face of active magnet.

    S←N attraction PULLS active magnet INWARD away from stator.

    Result: gap increases · F∝1/gap² · 75-90% cog eliminated.

The housing is only the stator. The entire mechanism is within the wheel.

VARIANT A — INDIVIDUAL PIVOT HOLDER

--------------------------------------

Each active magnet pivots on a pin fixed to the rotating wheel.

Pin = hinge only. Carries no load in normal operation.

CAM-LATCH MECHANISM (Addendum 17):

  The cam does NOT drive the magnet. The cam trips a latch only.

  Latch has two stable positions: OUT lock (extended) and IN lock (retracted).

  Cam contact force = latch spring only (0.5-2N vs 100-400N magnet force).

  200-800× less cam wear than direct cam drive.

  SNAP-ACTION EMF: Latch holds magnet stationary (dΦ/dt = 0) until latch

  releases, then field snaps holder to new position instantly.

  Fast snap = maximum dΦ/dt = maximum EMF pulse.

  Estimated: +15-40% peak EMF. THE LATCH IS THE EMF AMPLIFIER.

SAFETY GROOVE:

  Cut inside wheel. Pin sits loosely — never touched normally.

  Catches pin ONLY on failure. Groove wear = inspect fixed magnets.

  Seatbelt · not steering wheel.

COG REDUCTION: F = k/gap² · gap doubled → 75% cog eliminated.

VARIANT B — RING AXIAL TRAVEL (BLDC OUTRUNNER)

-------------------------------------------------

The BLDC outrunner topology (drone motors, PC fans, RC motors, e-bike hubs)

uses an outer rotating ring with magnets. This variant adds controlled axial

travel of the entire ring along the shaft.

SINUSOIDAL SHAFT GROOVE:

  A phi ratio sinusoidal groove is cut into the shaft surface.

  Period: 360°/P per pole pair (8 pole pairs = 8 waves per revolution).

  Ring pin rides in groove. As ring rotates, pin follows groove:

  Groove peak (phi offset): ring shifts INWARD → max axial overlap → peak EMF

  Groove trough (dead center): ring shifts OUTWARD → reduced overlap → cog reduced

  The groove wave is phi ratio asymmetric (not pure sine):

  Faster rise · peak at 38.17° before dead center · phi ratio fall.

  NOTE: This is the wavy rod from sketch 1 — correctly understood as the

  shaft surface. The sketch was the correct description all along.

SHAFT MAGNETS (optional):

  + push magnet on shaft: assists ring inward at phi offset.

  − pull magnet on shaft: assists ring outward at dead center.

  Groove guides · field assists · pin friction reduced.

RING VARIANT CAVEATS:

  Cog reduction: 15-30% (axial overlap, not gap² law — less than pivot variant)

  Snap-action EMF: not applicable (gradual ring shift)

  Advantage: simpler retrofit for existing BLDC outrunners globally.

COMBINED OPTIMAL (new builds):

  Pivot holders + sinusoidal shaft groove + inside magnets + cam-latch:

  Groove provides precise phi ratio timing and path constraint.

  Field magnets provide smooth drive force, reduce groove pin load.

  Cam-latch locks positions and produces snap-action EMF improvement.

  Near-zero wear. Self-diagnosing. No springs. No outer magnets.

OUTPUT IMPROVEMENTS (empirical validation required)

-----------------------------------------------------

Tidal Tower (181.2 kW base): +3% → ~186.6 kW | +8% → ~195.7 kW

HGG Utility (178 kW base): +3% → ~183.3 kW | +8% → ~192 kW

HGG Underground (11.7 MW): +3% → ~12.0 MW

PMM Outrunner (4,073 W/unit): +15% → ~4,684 W | +40% → ~5,702 W

8-unit PMM stack: ~37.5 kW (conservative) to ~45.6 kW (opt.)

COMPLETE PRIOR ART — ALL PUBLIC DOMAIN

----------------------------------------

ORIGINAL PIVOT-FIELD:

  Pivot-pin holder in rotating wheel March 19, 2026

  + push magnet INSIDE wheel at phi offset March 19, 2026

  − pull magnet INSIDE wheel at dead center March 19, 2026

  All fixed magnets inside wheel only · no outer magnets March 19, 2026

  Safety groove = diagnostic only · never loaded March 19, 2026

  Phi offset extraction at 38.17° March 19, 2026

  Zero contact normal operation March 19, 2026

CAM-LATCH (Addendum 17):

  Cam trips latch only · 200-800× less cam load March 19, 2026

  Two-position latch OUT lock / IN lock March 19, 2026

  Snap-action dΦ/dt · +15-40% peak EMF March 19, 2026

  Latch is the EMF amplifier March 19, 2026

  Spring eliminated · field handles return March 19, 2026

RING AXIAL TRAVEL VARIANT:

  BLDC outrunner ring axial travel on shaft March 19, 2026

  Sinusoidal phi ratio groove cut into shaft March 19, 2026

  Ring IN at phi offset · max axial overlap · peak EMF March 19, 2026

  Ring OUT at dead center · reduced overlap · cog less March 19, 2026

  + / − shaft magnets assist ring movement March 19, 2026

  Combined groove + inside magnets = optimal March 19, 2026

  Application to BLDC outrunner globally March 19, 2026

SYSTEM APPLICATIONS:

  CYR Tidal Pulse Tower March 19, 2026

  CYR Hourglass Gravity Generator March 19, 2026

  CYR PMM Outrunner March 19, 2026

  Any rotating PMG · drop-in upgrade March 19, 2026

FINAL ARCHITECTURE — LOCKED

-----------------------------

No further mechanism changes anticipated.

  Individual pivot: + push inside · − pull inside · cam-latch · snap EMF

  Ring variant: sinusoidal shaft groove · + / − shaft magnets

  Both: all fixed magnets inside · groove = seatbelt · field = muscle

------------------------------------------------------------------------------

FAIR AND SQUARE · NUMBERS DON'T LIE · SCIENCE ALWAYS WINS

Wolf13 / Alan Cyr · CYR Technologies · Chicago, IL · March 19, 2026

Hackaday.io — Digikey Green Powered Challenge

3·1·3 · DR=7 · Every installation helps Earth cool · 🐺⚡φ∞

==============================================================================

==============================================================================

ADDENDUM — BALANCED DUAL-RING HALF-SCREW SHAFT

Final Ring Variant · March 19 2026

==============================================================================

THE PROBLEM WITH SINGLE-RING AXIAL TRAVEL

------------------------------------------

The single-ring sinusoidal shaft groove works but produces a periodic axial

force every time the ring shifts position. At 380 RPM with 8 pole pairs:

50.7 axial force pulses per second at the shaft bearing. Pulsed axial load

causes bearing race fatigue and vibration at shift frequency.

THE BALANCED SOLUTION — TWO HALVES · ONE TWIST

------------------------------------------------

The shaft is divided into two equal sections with a 180° phase twist at

the center point.

LEFT HALF:

  Sinusoidal phi ratio groove — same as single-ring design.

  Peak (ring IN toward stator) occurs at phi offset position.

  Left ring follows this groove independently.

180° PHASE TWIST AT CENTER:

  The groove profile inverts 180° at the shaft midpoint.

  What was peak (IN) on left becomes trough (OUT) on right.

  What was trough (OUT) on left becomes peak (IN) on right.

  Always. Simultaneously. At every rotation angle.

RIGHT HALF:

  Sinusoidal phi ratio groove — 180° phase inverted.

  Peak (ring IN) occurs where left ring is OUT.

  Trough (ring OUT) occurs where left ring is IN.

  Right ring follows this groove independently.

THE TWO RINGS ARE DECOUPLED:

  Each ring has its own pin riding its own groove section.

  Load variation on left ring does not transfer to right ring.

  Each ring moves freely and independently.

  But their axial mass movements are always opposite.

AXIAL FORCE CANCELLATION:

  At every rotation angle:

    Left ring shifting IN → axial force inward

    Right ring shifting OUT → axial force outward (simultaneously)

    Equal magnitude · opposite direction · NET = ZERO

  The shaft bearing sees near-zero net axial load at all times.

  No pulsed fatigue. No vibration from ring shifting.

  Bearing life: extended significantly.

DOUBLED OUTPUT FREQUENCY:

  Left ring: peak EMF when ring IN (at phi offset)

  Right ring: peak EMF when ring IN (at phi offset of right groove)

  These are 180° apart in rotation.

  Instead of 1 EMF pulse per pole pair per revolution:

  2 EMF pulses per pole pair per revolution.

  Output frequency: doubled.

  Output ripple: halved.

  Same shaft. Same magnets. Two rings. Twist at center.

PHI RATIO TWIST ANGLE (alternative to 180°):

  For maximum Fibonacci spacing between EMF peaks:

  Twist angle = 360° / φ² = 360° / 2.618 = 137.5°

  (≈ the golden angle found in phyllotaxis · sunflower seeds · etc.)

  This gives the most uniform combined EMF distribution

  and the most Fibonacci-spaced output pulses.

  The golden angle appears here because the groove spacing

  IS the Fibonacci structure expressed in rotation geometry.

SINGLE vs BALANCED DUAL RING:

  Metric Single Ring Balanced Dual Ring

  EMF frequency 1× per pole pair 2× per pole pair ✓

  Output ripple Baseline ½ baseline ✓

  Axial force Pulsed one-dir Cancels · near zero ✓

  Bearing axial load Full pulsed Near zero ✓

  Vibration Present Near zero ✓

  Bearing life Standard Extended ✓

  Noise Present Eliminated ✓

PRIOR ART — BALANCED DUAL-RING HALF-SCREW SHAFT

-------------------------------------------------

All items public domain · March 19 2026 · Wolf13 · Alan Cyr · CYR Technologies

  Balanced half-screw shaft — two groove sections with 180° phase twist

  Decoupled dual ring — each ring follows own groove independently

  Axial force cancellation — left IN simultaneous with right OUT · net zero

  2× output frequency — 180° offset EMF pulses · ripple halved

  Phi ratio twist angle — 360°/φ² = 137.5° golden angle · Fibonacci spacing

  Extended bearing life — near zero net axial load · no pulsed fatigue

==============================================================================

ADDENDUM — DUAL HELICAL OFFSET COMPENSATION / CHANDLER PRINCIPLE

March 19 2026

==============================================================================

THE NAMING

----------

The balanced dual-ring half-screw shaft is more precisely described as a

Dual Helical Offset Compensation Shaft. Each helix compensates the cog

disturbance produced by the other. The name captures both the mechanism

(dual helix) and the function (offset compensation).

THE CHANDLER WOBBLE CONNECTION

--------------------------------

Earth's rotation axis does not point at a fixed location. It wobbles — the

Chandler Wobble. Two components combine:

  Annual component: 365 days (dominant)

  Chandler component: 433 days (subordinate)

  Beat period: ~6.4 years (when they reinforce)

Earth is constantly seeking the phi-ratio balance between its mass

asymmetries. The wobble IS the compensation mechanism. It is passive.

No mechanism. Pure geometry of mass distribution.

The dual helix shaft does exactly this for generator cog disturbance:

  Left helix: dominant compensation component

  Right helix: subordinate compensation component

  Phase offset: sets the beat period between them

  Beat: the diagnostic signal

Earth has been running this mechanism for 4.5 billion years.

The same geometry now applied to generator shafts.

THE GOLDEN ANGLE — OPTIMAL PHASE OFFSET

-----------------------------------------

The optimal phase offset between the two helices is not 180° (which gives

perfect cancellation but zero beat diagnostic) but the golden angle:

  360° / φ² = 360° / 2.618 = 137.508°

This is the same angle found in:

  Sunflower seed spiral spacing (optimal packing)

  Leaf phyllotaxis (maximum sun exposure, no overlap)

  Earth's wobble envelope timing (mass balance seeking)

At 137.5° offset between the two helices:

  Maximum output uniformity (minimum ripple)

  Minimum residual vibration

  Fibonacci-spaced beat pattern in output

  Self-diagnostic beat signal present but minimal

THE BEAT FREQUENCY AS DIAGNOSTIC

----------------------------------

At the golden angle phase offset, a very slow beat frequency appears in

the combined output — the Fibonacci-spaced envelope of the two ring EMF

contributions slightly reinforcing and cancelling over time.

  Beat present but stable: system at correct phase offset · healthy

  Beat growing: phase drifting from golden angle · inspect pins

  Beat absent (exact 180°): perfect cancellation · no diagnostic signal

  Beat rapid: phase far from optimal · service required

The beat frequency IS the health indicator. No sensors needed.

No electronics. Just listen to (or measure) the output envelope.

Earth does the same: geophysicists read Earth's wobble to measure

changes in its internal mass distribution. The shaft beat reads

the generator's mechanical condition.

PRIOR ART — FOUR NEW ITEMS

----------------------------

All public domain · March 19 2026 · Wolf13 · Alan Cyr · CYR Technologies

  Dual helical offset compensation shaft — one helix compensates

  the other's cog disturbance · passive · geometry only

  Chandler wobble principle applied to generators — Earth's

  annual+Chandler wobble as natural model for dual-helix

  mechanical offset compensation in rotating machinery

  Golden angle phase offset 137.5° — 360°/φ² · maximum EMF

  uniformity · minimum residual vibration · Fibonacci beat spacing

  · same angle as sunflower · leaf spiral · Earth wobble envelope

  Beat frequency as diagnostic — silent = healthy · beat growing

  = phase drift · service indicator requiring no sensors or

  electronics · geometry self-reports its own condition

==============================================================================