PMM PMG COMBO — PROJECT UPDATE · APRIL 10 2026

CYR TECHNOLOGIES · WOLF13

━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━

EVALUATION SCOPE — NEW DEVICE CLASS

─────────────────────────────────────

This is a new device class. It is not a standard motor.

It is not a standard generator. It is not a standard

motor-generator pair. Equations and efficiency models

derived from those unrelated devices do not govern this

geometry.

Evaluate this device on its own documented inputs, outputs,

and losses only. The 4:1 ratio · S N N S pole pattern ·

38.17° phi extraction · three-coil harvest · and two-state

bifilar BEMF circuit operate as a combined system. Partial

analogies to known devices are incomplete analogies.

Permanent magnets store real potential energy. Magnetic

attraction and repulsion are real forces. Real forces

through real distances do real work. F × d = joules.

This is not disputed physics. This device extracts from

that stored field energy through optimized geometry.

Losses are real, documented, and included in all models.

Judge the design on what is claimed. Not on what is not.

WHAT THIS SYSTEM IS

───────────────────

This is an externally driven motor-generator pair designed for

improved conversion efficiency — not a self-sustaining device.

External electrical drive to the PMM windings is continuous and

required throughout operation. The PMM will not self-start.

External start pulse or manual spin to threshold RPM is required

before the PMG engages.

Think of it like a car alternator system:

  - External battery starts the engine (one-time)

  - Engine reaches idle RPM

  - Alternator engages and maintains the battery throughout the run

  - External fuel continues — the alternator reduces how much is needed

This system works identically. External supply starts and drives

the PMM. PMG engages at threshold RPM and tops off the supercap

every pulse. BEMF recovery adds to the supercap each OFF state.

THE CORE CLAIM

──────────────

The external drive required to maintain operation is less than a

standard motor-generator pair doing the same job.

Standard motor-generator:

  External input = drive energy + 1.0 cog overhead − nothing recovered

CYR system (same output):

  External input = drive energy + 0.25 cog overhead

                               − BEMF refund each cycle

                               − PMG top-off each pulse

  Net external cost per revolution: significantly less.

The surplus is not free energy.

It is reduced input requirement for the same output.

Every unit of cog eliminated by phi geometry is a unit the external

supply no longer needs to provide. Less input wasted as heat.

Same useful output. That is the claim.

THE 2:0.25 GAIN MODEL

─────────────────────

Standard motor:

  Push → forward 1.0 ✓

  Cog → resists 1.0 ✗ (the whole problem)

  Pull → forward 1.0 ✓

  Net: 2 drive : 1 cog

CYR geometry alone (no pulse):

  Push → forward 1.0 ✓

  Cog → reduced 0.25 ◀ (38.17° phi eliminates 75%)

  Pull → forward 1.0 ✓

  Net: 2 drive : 0.25 cog

With pulse + BEMF:

  Pulse covers remaining 0.25 cog at crossing.

  BEMF partially refunds pulse cost each cycle.

  PMG output tops supercap while doing the job.

  Net pulse cost = 0.25 − BEMF%

Gain vs standard = 1.75 or greater (geometry floor only).

Real-world losses will reduce this. Prototype determines actual figure.

THE OPERATING CYCLE

───────────────────

ALL ON:

  Drive pulse fires into bifilar coil.

  Motor rotates. PMG generates.

  PMG output tops supercap while doing the job.

ALL OFF:

  Drive path breaks. Field collapses.

  BEMF flows through dual-speed diodes into supercap.

  Schottky diode: captures fast spike (nanoseconds).

  Standard diode: drains slow tail (microseconds).

ALL ON again. Continuous. Repeat.

The supercap is never...