Features
- One main part.
- One interlock type.
- 3D-printer-friendly:
*** Tolerant to +/- 0.3 mm geometry distortions.
*** Parts are flat and can be printed without supports.
*** Parts' deformations are aligned to printing layers.
- Injection molding friendly.
- Assembled models are empty-shelled. This makes compartments for
*** motors,
*** batteries,
*** control circuits in there.
Most parts take only 15 layers on my FDM printer. So printing of one set doesn't take long, but I want more parts to be printed in one session. Ideally hundreds of parts at once.
Parts are flat. What if I stack them layer by layer with a thin gap?
Set of 24 parts laid-out on a circular platform: 1x1-24.stl
The simplest cube from the previous log. This time printed. I intentionally skipped the parts deburring to check for +/-0.2mm tolerance promised. Despite some surface roughness, parts stick and click.
Construction sets can be divided in three large groups:
brick-based (Lego, MegaBlocks)
stick-based (K-nex)
plate-based (many screw-and-nuts construction sets)
I want to combine the simplicity of plastic interlocks with plate-base design.
This idea is not new, there are number of construction sets based on this idea. I just wan to give a try to my s-shaped interlock with convex-concave side surfaces.
The first and main part is a rectangular 1x1 plate having interlocks at each four sides. Interlock allows to attach parts in three right angles.
The simplest figure that can be assembled is a cube:
super neat idea. is there a reason why the smallest linking piece is so small compared to the chunkier part?
i.e., on any given side you have a small link part (and the negative/removal of it) as well as a large link part (and its negative). why aren't all these roughly the same size? (i.e., 1/4, 1/4, 1/4, 1/4 the size of the space available.)
ah, i (think i) see; it's so they can flex easier as the pieces are put together.
super neat idea. is there a reason why the smallest linking piece is so small compared to the chunkier part?
i.e., on any given side you have a small link part (and the negative/removal of it) as well as a large link part (and its negative). why aren't all these roughly the same size? (i.e., 1/4, 1/4, 1/4, 1/4 the size of the space available.)
ah, i (think i) see; it's so they can flex easier as the pieces are put together.