I cant seem to report a "project", but https://hackaday.io/project/194205-trust-roc-relocation-your-stress-free is literally just an ad for a company and was featured on my "discover" page

In the LHS column of the project's page there's a link Report as inappropriate under the dates of project creation and last update. Click on that and report as spam.

It seems I can't reply back to a comment that is >3-4 levels deep? 

https://hackaday.io/project/194177-realistic-roller-coaster/log/226229-motor-options

It seems I can't reply directly to zoxoxu's last reply? There are no options. I understand not wanting to nest that deeply, but I don't see another option...

Would like to know what term my project violated.

I can't seem to upload a 50k jpg file for a project log.

May have just been an intermittent issue, not seeing any errors on my end. Try again or PM the file or one similar to me and I can check it out.

Mastodon requires to have rel="me" in the link back to Mastodon in order to show the link to the website as verified - GitLab already doing that, but Hackaday shows external links as

<a href="https://mastodon.social/@shaos" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">

can you please add me to the rel-list like rel="me nofollow noopener" ? Thanks !

I'll look into this, thanks for the recommendation.

Thanks
My GitLab page with Mastodon link to compare:
https://gitlab.com/shaos

Is it possible to unlink my account from Twitter/X?  Or to search this project discussion for anyone else asking the same question?

I can unlink twitter, are you able to login with email currently?

can i repost it without sponsor content ?

I also cannot upload images.

I cannot add any more photos to my writeup and I cannot align the photos in the editor in a way that sticks and is predictable. IMHO Microsoft Word is a better experience. 

Image upload seems to be broken this morning...

the dark theme sucks, not contrasted at all, I hate it.

I know people with vision issues who prefer dark theme because it provides higher contrast than black on white. You of course can still hate it (I in fact am not  a fan) but don’t blame it on contrast.

This dangerous project should be removed. He will set Halloween costumes on fire. https://hackaday.io/project/192959-programming-propane-espnow-and-walkway-upgrades

It's too dark in here.

Does anyone else routinely reply to comments by: {type reply in text entry box below the comment; post reply; select-copy reply text; delete comment; click tiny gray-on-black "reply" link; paste copied reply; reply} ?

https://hackaday.io/profile won't let me save the profile if there is no Twitter link. Yes, that's correct, there is none, I never had any, and will never have it, either. 

It would be nice to be able to remove it, or leave it empty. Hopefully, just a GitHub profile would be sufficient.

I'll check that for you, maybe something is stuck. Thanks for also reminding me we need to update it to X...   :(

Is there a way for me to clear out "ghost followers" on some of my projects, or if that's not possible, reset the follower count to 0? (and then the ones that actually want to follow the project can re-follow) 

I get a notification when a user follows, and usually the follow:like ratio is roughly 1:1. However, some of my projects have hundreds of followers that I've never been notified about, despite only have single-digit likes (that I'm always notified about), which makes it seem like these "followers" are either a bug or bots. I looked into some of these followers and they follow projects that have high follow counts, with some where the amount of views == the amount of follows. 

How about providing a way to "like" or generally acknowledge a log entry for a followed project? Sometimes I want to simply ding a bell that I've read a new log for a ongoing project and appreciate that my fellow hacker persists at something that's taking more than two weeks. I know I can leave a comment, but a succession of "I appreciate that you're persisting at something that's taking more than two weeks" comments would have progressively decreasing snr vs just a counter to bump.

+1 on this 

Here's a weird bug: On my page https://hackaday.io/page/11900-costing-assembly-service-for-my-pcb , the links associated with the comments point to a different project e.g. https://hackaday.io/page/11900-koat0-portable-terminal/discussion-190917 However clicking on the link doesn't go to that project but back to the same page, but at the top, not the comment.

Yep looks like a bug on pages comment links, thanks.

It got more bizarre, now it ostensibly points to a different page but still takes one back to the same page. It seems that the website only uses the page ID to reach the destination page and the text after that is ignored. Unfortunately the discussion ID is also dropped so it cannot land on the actual comment.

Hey Hackaday, possibly a niche problem, but I'd love to be able to replace broken image tags in place. Dragging a file over a broken img tag highlights the same as a working image, but dropping the file does nothing. I'd expect it to replace the src of the target element with the uploaded file, but this doesn't happen.

This is because I write my articles externally in markdown, then copy the rendered HTML into the online editor. It works great for text formatting, but with images I currently have to go through every one, copying the alt text, deleting the element, dragging the file into the now vacant spot, and reapplying the alt text.  It would be a lot quicker to drag files onto the img tags without recreating them.

Maybe other people aren't writing 7000 word articles with 40 images in them though 😅

The Z80-MBC3 is a DESIGN, an upgraded version with similar characteristics as the other single board computers, including the predecessor : the Z80-MBC2 which has been on Hackaday for more than four years. So there is no argument to exclude an upgraded and modified DESIGN from another user.

As the Z80-MBC2 which also an advertorial for the kits that Just4Fun sells and posted links here on Hackday. He describes it here, on Facebook, on Github, and various other places like : https://shop.mcjohn.it

The italian shop is not mine, nor one from Just4Fun himself. But the Z80-MBC2 ( the older version ) is a commercial product, as any other "kit" is a bundle of components offered for sale with which the buyer can finish it to a usable device. This publication is INFORMATION about the updated and revised design of the older design. Therefore it has INFORMATIVE value to people who are interested in building devices with kits.

Lutetium thinks that there is a principle difference between the Z80-MBC2 and the Z80-MBC3 . There isn't. The latter is simply an updated and enhanced version of the older (MBC2) one.

Which link are you complaining about and is the one that you are rejecting ? I don't see any links in the latest version of my Z80-MBC3 project here. So what do you mean with "link dumpung". Hackaday invites to add a whole range of links, but I did not use these.