-
Hack Chat Transcript, Page 4
06/28/2023 at 21:15 • 0 commentsI tried 0.1mm wire, handheld. Was thinking about feeding it through a glass capillary and using a mechanical sensor on the capillary for the we're-too-low signal.
that's a really good idea using a glass tube
Didn't do spark counting, was considering partially overlapping circles being bitten out of the copper.
I would think it would be hard to get a super clean line in the copper.
I will have to head out soon. Are there any lingering technical questions?
The question is, how hard it is to get clean-enough line.
You'd have to try it on a machine to find out
Yup. Didn't get enough round tuits yet.
get one. they're so worth it
About to play with some elastomers. Printing gaskets, and wearables.
Gaskets are an issue for fluids-handling.
Wrote some software earlier for gcode generation for drawing on fabrics, dot by dot, by just touching the surface from top-down and then retracting and going to another pixel. Eliminated issues with lateral forces on the pen and the fabric wrinkling. Can be also handy for spark-engraving surfaces.
https://www.improwis.com/2017-01-27-3dPrinterFabricPeckPrintingTest/
May be an idea handy for something.
Sweet! I'll take a look
Hello everybody! Sorry I'm joining so late. Currently at work.
👋 I think we're just about finishing up now. Do you have any questions I can answer before I go?
Scrolling back to get an idea of what went on...
I'll be posting a transcript in a minute
No questions (yet)...
Is your stuff here on Hackaday? Will probly refer to it later.
Plus Tom Nardi usuallyu does a nice summary article on Friday
I'm going to be heading out soon.
Let me say thanks so much for having me, everyone! It was a ton of fun to chat about EDM. I loved all the great questions and appreciate everyone taking the time to chat!
If you want to follow what we’re doing, here’s our links to follow:
Discord Chat:
https://discord.com/invite/z4XNk7Hkgw
Twitter:
https://twitter.com/RackRobotics
Youtube:
https://www.youtube.com/@rackrobo
Kickstarter Updates:
https://www.kickstarter.com/projects/rackrobotics/powercore-cut-through-solid-metal-with-edm/posts
Website Email List:
Thanks Cooper, this was fantastic. I really appreciate your time today!
I appreciate you having me. I love to nerd out to EDM and related processes so this was a real treat! -
Hack Chat Transcript, Page 3
06/28/2023 at 21:14 • 0 commentsThere are limitations to a rod-based process, but there is nothing else commercial out there that can do this at this price range. We view this as a great start and taking desktop EDM from 0 to 1.
@Thomas Shaddack I believe it would work with sintered brass or copper. I would love to try it
If it cuts 2mm steel and drills 40mm holes into steel I buy it. Is it possible?
There is a company Sapphire 3D that we have been talking to
Virtual Foundry has the filaments. Or, if you want to skip the printing and go hand-moulding, metal clays or art clays, they come in copper/bronze/silver (and gold).
I have not tried either of those cuts so I could not tell you one way or the other
Do you think it is possible?
Virtual foundry looked cool. I would like to check that out.
Is the metal in thermoplastic binder conductive before burning out the binder?
Would be a great thing for eg. gears. No need to stock all the billets, all the diameters we may need, and remove inly a small fraction of the material, wasting little.
I think for gears you'd ideally just be doing wire EDM on those, depending on size
Nope, I assume. The percolation threshold for decent conductivity is hard to reach.
Oh are you referring to the tool as a printed part?
@Bharbour yes it is metal powder in a binder filament
@gedm-dev probably. You'd have to try it out
What if I told I have and found out that it just won't work?
You would likely have to fully process the part.
I would say to change parameters or tool geometry and to try again. EDM is a very complex process with a lot of ways to get things right
I'm serious about it. Don't let people think they can mount an EDM unit to a printer and cut steel. I ripped apart GRBL to the core and compared it to Marlin. The core looks similar. And no. It won't work.
I generally recommend cutting aluminum with the Powercore. That's what we've had the most success with and what we've described in the Kickstarter. There is a lot of testing to be done on steel to find the limitations.
If you were to use a wire tool you'd probably be doing great with steel on a 3D printer
Are the limitations hard ("impossible") or soft (just s-l-o-w)?
a wire is ~8x smaller in diameter than the rods we use right now. So it will cut around 8x faster through the same material.
And really, there's a lot to be said for being able to mill parts on a desktop with a repurposed printer, even if it's "just" aluminum
I know. But everyone who have ever cutted hard steels and Aluminum know that Aluminum is like cutting a paper with a chansaw. This will work more or less good. But steel is something different.
@Thomas Shaddack it is not impossible. The sparks erode steel. I do not have a lot of hard data on feeds and speeds yet but there are about to be 420+ people with the means to find out.
Was thinking about a variant. A small-size high-accuracy EDM, for turning wasted pieces of carbide drill bits into taps or dies or single-point turning tools.
EDM is known to cut laterally any material that is conductive. This included hardened steels I am sure its just a matter of good process control.
Yes. Like I said, the sparks to remove material. You're probably going to be running ~3x slower in any steel stock when compared to aluminum of the same thickness.
@Cooper What is the minimum feedrate that a normal Ender can provide?
The wear ratio is also worse with steel.
@Dan Maloney I agree. I am excited to try out some extruder and hotend parts from aluminum when I get the free time to do so
Nozzle drilling.
DIY high flow nozzles 😍
Braze a little piece of tungsten carbide into the standard brazz nozzle tip. EDM-drill.
You could also play with orifice geometry
@gedm-dev idk off the top of my head. Somewhere around 15mm/min is my guess
you could ask creality
That is way to fast for HSS.
yes you'd definitely want to do a wire EDM tool for that.
at least thick stuff
If you remember the GEDM video. HSS drilled at about 1mm/min at 30v. A bit faster at 60.
Higher voltages would help you. I've spoken to Ben Fleming about this and he recommends upwards of 120v for steels
With how big electrode?
I think Ben uses die plunging for his EDM machines, so fairly large
but he's also pulsing around 200KHz iirc
The size was from 1 to 3mm in the video. That didn't affected the speed much. Enough power to compensate the size.
Seems like something you could fix with a couple of pulleys and belts. Yeah, it's a hardware change, but if you really want to cut HSS on an Ender, seems like solid investment
That wouldn't make it a stock ender. Or?
@Dan Maloney that's very true! I was just thinking the same thing. Overall John and I believe that wire will be the way to go in the future
@gedm-dev think of this as the early days of RepRap. Did the extruder design stay the same over time? Perfect is not important right now. It is making solid progress and continuing to do so consistently.
Or maybe use solenoid for the z-axis, for the slow sinking. Feedback directly to the spark. Once it moves off the limits, do a move by the machine's steppers. Assuming we go primarily top-down.
There is going to be a lot of learning about desktop EDM for everyone in the next few years.
I hope so -- the idea of home-gamer EDM is very exciting to me
I'm just concerned that you made the people believe they can cut metal if they buy your product. But the facts clearly say that this is just not true.
Simplest might just be to gear the axes like Dan said. That would be mostly printable for people
For me as well. Circling around it for years and didn't start biting yet.
Yeah it's really exciting! I just wish I had more time to play with EDM instead of running things right now.
@gedm-dev, I think we get your point, thanks.
OK@cooper That's again just a fix that you haven't tested for a problem you say doesn't exist. Confusing.
How much EMI does the process cause? Will it tend to cause trouble with the controllers?
We have not had significant errors due to EMI yet. We have had the PSU tested at an FCC facility, but that doesn't include the electrodes.
As an informal test, we are able to steam HD video on a phone right next to the spark gap during cuts.
The enclosure is aluminum and is well grounded, so that helps with PSU noise. I certainly wouldn't put an antenna on the output though
Phones don't have unshielded wiring of considerable length all around.
Yes that's true
I don't think the PSU itself will be a problem. The spark and the wires to the spark, more likely.
Yes definitely. It is an inherently EMI heavy process
Thought. Software-defined radio for contactless process monitoring.
Thomas, we have considered the exact same thing!
Heee!
There's definitely potential there
Here's something else neat you can do with EDM.
I saw somewhere a sink-edm design, very rudimentary, that used a capacitor-resistor bank and regulated the electrode sink rate by voltage on the cap. Above threshold, send steps to stepper. Below second threshold, send steps upwards.
What's that?
Ancient tech.
drill holes and then tap them with an orbital path afterwards
Those almost look like MIG tips
If you had a good way to switch out tools and keep position you could drill holes and thread afterward with EDM
Thought. Rotating copper disc as an EDM equivalent of a grinding wheel. For sharpening carbide tools.
How are you doing the threading?
@Thomas Shaddack that's a cool idea. I think you might be better off just getting new carbide though.
The finish from EDM will not mimic factory
@Dan Maloney you would EDM a hole first and then switch to the threading tool. The threading tool would orbit within the already drilled hole.
Have you done a sinker job like that?
True. But think resource-constrained areas (Mars base, some hole in the middle of Africa...), or logistical pressures (we can't wait for delivery).
We have not tried tapping yet though
It's an idea. I have seen people cut carbide on desktop with EDM before
this was someone I've been speaking to.
Doesn't surprises me. it may not work very well. Aluminum and water in combination with a none moving sinker electrode = trouble. High material removal rate may help. But all in all Alu can be pain in combination with water.
I remember seeing spark-threading on the TV back in the 1980s. They were just rotating a threaded electrode at the same time as they lowered it. I am not sure threadmilling had been invented then, or maybe its just that the EDM threading inventor hadn't heard of it.
I'm out. Keep up the good.... Hmm. Scam. :D
If you're doing a sinker op you're going to want oil anyway. The threading op isn't really sinker though
It is an orbital path around an already drilled hole. Water should be fine
@Andy Pugh that is another way to do it.
Some photos of my circuitboard experiments. Under a big drop of kitchen-class vegetable oil under stereomicroscope. Hint, it WILL aerosolize and cleaning the lens is a pain.
https://www.improwis.com/projects/method_EDMdischargeCircuitboardEtching/
Method under development - EDM machining of circuitboards
Electrical discharge machining of circuitboards
If you use a bit more distilled water it will splash far less. Like keep the tool submerged an inch or so to prevent splash
there is little enough matl to remove that water will be fine.
Yup. It was a proof of concept if it can work at all.
What sort of PSU did you use?
Just a lab power supply, using resistor to limit current to a capacitor, and a handheld wire. Voltage in the ballpark of 12v, cap if I remember some tens to hundreds microfarads?
I think we're around 52uF rn on the Powercore
I think the crucial thing is the spark energy delivered to the metal itself. Not enough and you just dent the copper. Too much and you get a crater with ejecta around.
The 35um of copper isn't that much to eat through, can be done on a single spark.
Is overdoing it a problem? I would like to try this on the Powercore
oil might be perfect for PCBs. Slow and steady to make those.
May be if you want extra-high resolution. Certainly worth trying. You may scorch the resin below, will see.
Have you calculated your sparks per second?
Hack Chat Transcript, Page 2 06/28/2023 at 21:12 • 0 comments
Ok. My bad. Just searched a little and found an old discussion on the topic and that it will be hard work to implement.
Does negative feed completes a full line segment or can it ride the line back and forth to any position until reversed?
Aluminum 22.12.4.mov
2 MB
This video is of 4mm aluminum we cut on the Ender 3
one sec I will add a pic. Thought the video would embed
@gedm-dev It runs the whole G-code program in reverse.
Until stopped? Let's say it just want to retract a tiny segment of the line and then go back. Possible?
@Andy Pugh that sounds perfect.
Does it handle arcs as well?
I would guess it only runs in reverse until the trigger is not flipped for that to happen
@gedm-dev It runs backwards as long as the adaptive-feed is negative, stops if it is zero, runs backwards at hald speed if it is -0.5. backwards at double speed if it is -2 etc etc
I forked grbl and made it usable for EDM. And decided against reversing the full GCode since arcs would just be a pain to reverse.
The idea would be to program a feed faster than the cut, and have the controller adjust the speed up/down/reverse to manage the cut.
@gedm-dev Watch the video I linked above.
The video shows an arc
Very cool stuff.
In marlin, delta printers convert straight lines into very short segments that are straight-enough. Could this be leveraged for the retractions?
That was John, my co-founder who made that video.
If it works it works. I don't think it is too hard without adjusting feeds. The feed should normally be created by the feedback itself. In my first tests I tried using some PID controlled feedrate adjustments. It worked somehow. But other ways turned out to work better.
Can the electrode wear be compensated by taking periodic checks by touching the electrode against eg. a touch probe?
@Andy Pugh nice work. Must be brutal to get running to that point.
Thomas, this is normally not necessary or ideal. It is best to work with a known diameter tooling and to just move to a "clean" portion of it
@gedm-dev That's what I was meaning, the programmed feedrate is set "out of the way" of the system, just because G-code needs one, and then the entire process is managed by a PID (or similar) that controls the adaptive-feed pin to achieve the desired arc voltage (or whatever the actual process variable is)
Wear ratio between tool and work is generally pretty consistent. Once you nail down the feed rate for a given matl you can use that
Interesting - so what is the best combo of process variables you've found?
In practical terms, can you swap a printer back and forth from FDM to EDM? Or are you better off just buying a dedicated printer for EDM work?
Nyles that is a pretty complex question lol
Yes it is :D
Hi Ethan.
We define wear ratio as the ratio between XY motion and the necessary Z movements.
For thinner aluminum or titanium you can use a low ratio like 0.03
For thicker stuff you'll need a higher ratio. We've set things up like this not because it will make a perfectly efficient process, but because it will be easy for people to use.
Dan, you can absolutely swap back and fourth. It is a rather fast process on the Ender and we have done so a few times. If you plan on doing a lot of EDM it might be easiest just to have a dedicated machine though
@Andy Pugh Are you going to write the new software for the rack team?
I need no excuses to buy more tools...
There are no firmware changes required on a stock Ender 3 or similar printer to run EDM, so it's just physical parts that get fastened on
You do not need the excuses. But... do you WANT them?
Lol only $99 at microcenter!
I noticed that the github link to the reverse-run-2.7-rebase branch seems to be 404.
Do you have another link to the source?
Alas, the nearest Microcenter is at least a 6 hour drive for me
💀
Nyles, something interesting regarding process parameters has to do with electrode materials. Generally you'll run electrode negative for EDM'ing for speed using brass and graphite. But you have to run copper electrode positive to make anything useful happen.
Slower burn with copper, but better surface finish from what I've seen. Better wear compared to brass too.
@darkomenz It's fully integrated into the current 2.8 released version.
Hah, that hurts my head. :)
Can oil be used instead of DI water?
yep!
We've also used rubbing alcohol in a pinch.
@darkomenz You just need to do a G52 P1 to enable adaptive feed, and then vary the motion.adaptive-feed pin
Oops, it's actually 15 hours away -- the one in Denver
@Andy Pugh Awesome I am just digging for some more documentation to see how its used. Any chance you can help?
I wouldn't recommend using alcohol though.
@cooper of course you need firmware changes. The stock firmware may work somehow with aluminum. Does it work with steel? It won't work with steel. Maybe somehow some things can get working but it won't be any good.
@Thomas Shaddack we are having good success with regular distilled water from the store. No need for DI water on the desktop
Also@gedm-dev the firmware of the printer does not need to be changed. The Powercore is what's doing the EDM, not the printer.
No degradation of conductivity over time?
So it works with steel?
Thomas, there is some increase in conductivity, but not much. More problematic will be the waste material in the water
I used to run a sample-preparation EDM (back in the 80s) which ran paraffin (kerosene) as the dielectric.
Yes, we have had success with steel cutting.
How many steps does it take for Marlin to stop am move?
Any pictures?
Andy, this is generally used in sinker EDM from what I've heard. When there is large surface area or difficulty flushing.
I have also heard of people using WD-40!
I don't have a pic on me. There may be one on the discord.
I don't have a lot of hard data on steel yet as we only really got that working after the KS ended and we have been swamped with work fulfilling that.
Cooper--looks like you are using a single, high voltage power supply for both the initial ionization (>40V) and also for delivering the power for the spark (around 22V +/ 2-3 volts), but this means a lot of power dissipated in the PCB power resistor. Did you look at what seems to be more common in commercial units, to use two power supplies? Low current high voltage for the ionization, low voltage high current for the spark.
Marlin needs a given amount of steps to securely deaccel and stop. The number of steps is what is left in the buffer. I don't know how many steps it takes to stop the motion but the number of steps is high enough to make it a problem for EDM.
@Dale Grover we have a new configuration in the works that is closer to that. Talking with our electronics designer we believe that a more efficient supply will be very attainable.
@gedm-dev we have not had issues with that. Our system runs fine open loop so far.
Power is definitely wasted in the power resistor. This is something we want to get rid of asap
Does the deceleration/acceleration play role in the very slow movements of the EDM process? You can watch this video. It shows the first x motion with the GRBL fork with 2mm HSS.
From the concept and what you say this should work with any printer. But somehow it doesn't appear to be that easy for some reason. And that reason is somewhere in the firmware.
@Thomas Shaddack this is more due to the material removal rates. EDM uses very small sparks that can only reach so far
You also have to remove waste from the interelectrode gap
Two supplies also enables opportunities to sense various conditions--arc, open, short, etc.--fairly quickly in the process so you can take action faster.
@Thomas Shaddack It does. Depending on the voltage t can be 10 steps from spark to short circuit.
If you have 80 steps in the segment buffer.. You get the math.
That's what I mean. Low rate -> slow movement -> no need to deal with acceleration.
Thought. A pulse signal from the power supply to a controller GPIO. Spark happen, we wait a tiny bit in the stepper.cpp before we do next step. The auto-slowdown.
I think the absolutely fastest we've push the current setup was around 120mm per minute linear feed, but that was really thin .5mm aluminum.
The concept of marlin uses a planner buffer to create the instruction blocks and then passes them to the segment buffer. If you stop a motion you need to run the current segment buffer to the end. Deaccel or not it will take the steps left.
There is some compliance in the brass rod that helps to self adjust the gap
So In my opinion Marlin as it is won't ever do good with steel.
(the talk of big sparks and rapid removal just reminded me of it)
Absolutely not the same thing, but I was very impressed by the finesse in arc-gouging shown here:the EDM process has SOME force to it when a spark occurs. This pushes the cantilever rod back enlarging the gap.
You can't really see it happening, but if you hold the rod in your hand(don't do this btw) you can feel it pushing back
The force of the gas bubble from the spark?
Yep!
@Andy Pugh that's super cool stuff. We have done some of this on titanium with our Powercore out of dielectric. It looked like a welder in here lol
Any issues with UV exposure?
None that we've experienced.
Isn't the UV shielded away by the workpiece, electrode, AND the process fluid?
Yes. You can still see the sparks so I assume there is something going on there. Water is pretty good at absorbing/scattering UV iirc
Your system runs fine with 1mm aluminum sheets. You showed one picture of an attempted cut into steel that looked like it was a pain and needed hundreds manual electrode corrections and still did not finished well.
If you would be able to do it there would be pictures like you showed the one of the 4mm aluminum cut.
We started our testing back around December of last year on steel. That's likely what you're referring to. We're having better success with steel now.
But to be fair. If it is possible to cut steel with your concept on an avergae Ender without firmware update. Cool. I'll buy it.
If you give any guarantees this works of course.
Also, gotta start somewhere. I expect wire EDM to be much more useful than rod EDM
So we're up past the top of the hour and I haven't yet dropped a decent EDM pun, so let me just say that I really appreciate all the discussion this Hack Chat sparked today. Thanks so much to Cooper for suggesting this topic and for giving up his time to come talk to us. And thanks to all for the great questions.
Feel free to keep the discussion going, of course -- the Hack Chat is always open for business!
Can it work with sintered metal? There are 3d printing filaments (metal in thermoplastic binder) that can be fired into massive metal, with some shrinkage and consequent inaccuracies. The sexiest material I saw printed this way is inconel, which is also a royal pain weknowwhere to machine. (More common filaments are tool and stainless steels, copper, bronze...)
Thank you all! Topic: Spark gap control with GRBL:
Hack Chat Transcript, Page 1 06/28/2023 at 21:10 • 0 comments
Hey guys, I'm a bit early but here's a great starter on desktop EDM:Hi Cooper, welcome to the show!
Finishing up some stuff but I will be ready for questions noon pacific time
Hi Dan!
aaaaand I'm back
OK, then, let's get started. Dan here, I'll be moderating today along with Dusan as we welcome Cooper Zurad to the Hack Chat for a discussion about Desktop EDM. And apologies in advance for the inevitable typos -- getting used to a new keyboard here.
Hi Copper -- want to get us going with a little bit about yourself?
I remember that video, good stuff.
Thanks, Dan.
See? Copper != Cooper.
Grrr...
Hi everyone! My name is Cooper Zurad. I have years of experience in electrochemical machining (ECM) and have recently been developing electrical discharge (EDM) systems. All of this work has been on desktop processes.
I am co-founder of a company called Rack Robotics. We produce affordable EDM power supplies meant to convert your 3D printer into an EDM machine.
We are close to shipping our first product, the Powercore. We launched this project on Kickstarter
a few months ago. Link here: [https://www.kickstarter.com/projects/rackrobotics/powercore-cut-through-solid-metal-with-edm](https://www.kickstarter.com/projects/rackrobotics/powercore-cut-through-solid-metal-with-edm?ref=user_menu)
If you want a quick rundown on how the Powercore works and how it can convert your 3D printer to an EDM machine, check out this great video by my co-founder, John:
Other than that, I’m open to any and all questions regarding desktop EDM and it’s future. Excited to be here!
How do you deal with electrode wear?
Electrode wear is an interesting problem
There are several ways to deal with this
In our current implementation we move the electrode downwards in the Z axis as we cut in the XY plane
this allows us to have a consistent kerf width in the process
I'm interested in using EDM for 'drilling' deep, precise holes in metal. The problem I see when using the powercore with a 3D printer, is that chips would be stuck in the hole. How do you deal with this?
To do so we've forked LaserWeb4 and added a custom post processor
(where deep > 100 mm)
Redfast, I would recommend remixing the EDM tool holder to allow thru flushing of dielectric
The files are on our printables page. Link incoming.
This would allow the waste to be removed consistently
https://www.printables.com/@RackRoboticsO_631255
Files + CAD here:Do you need a hollow electrode for that? Or will a standard brazing rod do the trick?
Yes, Dan, you'd need a hollow electrode.
Would an injection needle work? In effect it is a stainless steel tube.
The files are now setup for solid rods as we've focused on emulating the function of a fiber laser on desktop. But the CAD is available for remixing
Does that leave a "slug" inside the electrode>
Thomas, I would not recommend it. I've used those for ECM plunging, but you really want brass or copper for EDM
How do you 'mill' out the bottom of the hole with the hollow electrode?
Dan, yes it would leave a slug if it was a blind hole.
The edm electrodes for drilling are not just plain pipes.
Let me find and image for you Nyles. There are specialized electrodes for drilling blind holes
They usually have several smaller pipes inside and you can rotate them.
What happens if stainless is used? What's the drawback?
I assume that the electrodes are only in a limited amount of dimensions, how would you then go about drilling other dimensions?
Stainless is too high resistance generally
it will get hot
These are the blind hole electrodes
Cool, thanks.
I'd imagine you could bore the hole with a hollow electrode, then change to a solid electrode and remove the slug. Just a naive guess, though
Np. They are available on Aliexpress etc
Would your power supply be usable for wire EDM?
That's not a bad idea, Dan
Andy, I believe so. We have done preliminary testing and have had good results
Would it get too hot even if cooled with the dielectric used to flush the hole?
You need to be able to draw the wire at consistent speeds, which is an engineering challenge in of itself.
(LInuxCNC was modified a few years ago to allow negative feed-override, which reverses the path, specifically for wire-EDM purposes)
Thomas, I have tried doing EDM with steel electrodes and getting a consistent "burn" is hard. It really will not remove much
In the end you want 2 different materials. One that is electrically conductive and one that is less so
Brass electrodes and tubing are abundant and work very well for EDM. Having experimented with both, it is just easier to use the brass
I'd imagine there's a relationship between power needed and electrode size, especially for big tooling like for sinker EDM. Again, a naive assumption maybe, but it seems like there has to be a limit to what the power supply can handle. True? Hi
I think that sinker EDM is usually graphite. This is probably partly due to it being easy to machine.
Have you tried graphite?
Andy, the LinuxCNC thing is interesting. Marlin was also modified to do this
Yes we have tried graphite. It was initially the only thing we could use to cut steel
Graphite works very well for EDM
the only issue is its relatively high internal resistance compared to brass. It will get hot enough to melt our 3D prints and Wago connectors
Hello Copper when will the first units be shipping and when can we expect the open source release for the Power Core?
Cooper ** Sorry
Hi darkomenz! I remember you from the Discord ;)
Indeed hope your day has been going well.
I did some very rudimentary attempts to EDM copper-clad boards. Managed to get nice clean burn just through the copper on single spark. Can this be used as an alternative to milling circuitboards?
We expect to be shipping Kickstarter units before the end of July. Source will release when we begin shipping.
Just dropped off 700lbs of aluminum to the powder coater today
I do not believe EDM is a good choice for milling PCBs. Tool wear and inconsistent burn completeness may cause issues
also if you mill anything into isolation, it is no longer on the EDM circuit.
Something we didn't promise backers, but will be delivering, is a custom software for doing EDM with your Powercore. A fork of LaserWeb4 that will make it very easy to set up complex, multi path cuts.
I thought Gridfinity was released under a non-com license.
We are not selling Gridfinity
You print your own parts
oh
It is a great standard that we find very useful for organizing tools though. Love Zach
It will. But tool wear can be compensated (we do not have depth to go into, and a single spark of proper energy removes a nice circle of copper (tested with 0.1mm wire electrode and capacitor discharge) with both getting nicely through and not making a crater with melted-out walls. The suspicion I have is that it will be less troublesome than adjusting a mill. The toolpaths would of course have to be designed to not make insulated islands. (Side-to-side line-by-line raster is a bruteforce approach, could be done smarter.)
I am disapointed to find that the Kickstarter is US-only. I was actually about to press the button.
Sup boys. Hope you have a good day.
Will there be a schematic for the power supply?
Thanks Andy. We are expecting to be able to serve Europe and Canada starting around October if all goes well.
Happy to finally found some really knowledgeable guys to talk to about EDM.
Thomas, yep! We're going to be releasing everything as we get the KS units out the doors. We wanted to make sure our Backers got theirs before anyone else.
I built the XY platform for a wire-edm project, but stalled at the PSU stage.
How would you go about drilling deep holes with non-standard diameters that don't have an electrode for them?
That's definitely the hardest part of everything. The rest of the build can be very similar to 3D printers
Red, that's a good question. I suppose it comes down to your specific needs. You might turn a part to the correct OD.
If you ask me the hardest part is the software. Marlin, Klipper and LinuxCNC won't work very well out of the box.
@redfast00 Buy the next size up and machine down?
Otherwise you could probably drill a pilot and then orbit around to make the size correct
Yes, software is very difficult. We've been fortunate enough to be able to pay a professional to do our software.
Can a nonstandard electrode be made by electroforming copper into 3d-printed mould?
Marlin is something I don't think I will ever work with again if I can help it lol
I would not electroform it. You will not get enough current through that coating and it will quickly be worn away by the EDM process.
I agree I think the two large challenges in this space is a working pulsed power supply and software that can handle the specific needs of the edm process.
So what motion control do you want to use?
@gedm-dev LinuxCNC would need a HAL component to monitor the arc and tweak the feed-override. But that shouldn't be too hard.
(In fact, I have done it already)
Solid metal or graphite is the way to go
Electroforming, as massive millimeter-class thickness (and then peeling off the printed part that formed the outside constraints). Not mere electroplating.
gedm-dev, we are using a custom fork of LaserWeb4 for planning. Otherwise you can run our EDM implementation on a stock printer
@Andy Pugh That's only half the truth. Marlin and GRBL are inspired by LinuxCNC. They all use some kind of ringbuffer. A planner buffer to prepare instructions and a segment buffer for the execution.
no closed loop yet, but that hasn't been an issue for us very much.
If you need to retract you need to wait until the last block in the segment buffer is executed.
@gedm-dev LinuxCNC does not use any buffering. Trust me on that, I am the lead developer.
Dominik Meffert tried to make Marlin closed loop for his EDM work. He has had some success.
https://hackaday.io/project/181551-sinker-edm-machine
I have worked with him on getting his fork working, but it took a long time and was pretty unreliable for what we were doing
I putzed with Marlin's guts some time ago. The stepper control could have a retract-return mode that issues fixed rate of pulses to z-axis, fixed number, should be possible to shoehorn into the segment processing in the stepper.cpp part.
Maybe I'm outdated but wasn't there something on the linuxcnc page and why it will be hard to use for EDM?
I've seen people running automated retracts on LinuxCNC mills. This makes me thing it'd work pretty well for it
Userspace possibility. Break the paths to very short segments. Lots of overhead on the serial port. Much faster reactions.
I would be interested in trying to make it work on Klipper just because more people are familiar with it though.
@gedm-dev Maybe, we added the negative adaptive feed only a few years ago.