Time is running out.
I have managed to get data from a remote transmitter, but the range is poor. Might be the lack of LOS (Line of Sight) between the receiver and the transmitter, but I suspect something else.
I brought the receiver and the transmitter at close range (that is 10 cm).
The receiver displayed its RSSI: -44dBm.
I moved 3 m away: -57dBm.
I connected them together: -42dbm.
The transmitter should send out 20 dBm.
I fired up a spectrum analyzer at work and conected the RF output through -45dB attenuation. I centered the analyzer on 434MHzwith 100MHz span
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b908e/b908e0a9a495a408f2016a24940b799fbff9a5e2" alt="Fig. 1: Power output measurement, with 45dB attenuators. Fig. 1: Power output measurement, with 45dB attenuators."
The marker peaked at -27.98dBm.Let's call it -28. Add 45 and we get 17dBm. Not bad, it migh actually output 20dBm, but the attenuators definitely have some tolerance and the thin coax cable is certainly not loss-less. I bought it from ebay.
Let's try a different coax, maybe this one is of low quality and has high losses.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fc405/fc405a4e4640ab60be267e4146e2e3e53bf42cc8" alt="Fig. 2: Output power measurement, -45dBm attenuation. Fig. 2: Output power measurement, -45dBm attenuation."
With a new coax, the result is very close, but the soldering job at the board certainly dropped 0.2dBm. So the module outputs a decent amount of power and the cable is not as bad as I thought.
Let's see what does the receiver receive. I borrowed a better pair of antennas from a colleague (thank you Marius):
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/68976/6897698fb87bbc506f0f135e4d51718fb1de6f8f" alt="Fig. cx: NA711 433MHz antenna. Fig. cx: NA711 433MHz antenna."
And I connected it to the analyzer, with no attenuation. I got -3dBm. Quite a loss from all those 17dBm, but still far away from the -44dBm returned by the receiver.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b8d2f/b8d2fa8768c73c316442ae751a362d423cc7fb52" alt="Fig. 3: Homemade antenna and NA711 side by side. Fig. 3: Homemade antenna and NA711 side by side."
And I tried several other antennas:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c0ab6/c0ab66858f09e9a5a9ce66cf923fb7e76e8961aa" alt="Fig. 4: Two Na771 side by side. Fig. 4: Two Na771 side by side."
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6af48/6af489eb6a2b6161fc74b14892b34e1475ec75fa" alt="Fig. 5: 2xNa771 - Results: -1.5dBm Fig. 5: 2xNa771 - Results: -1.5dBm"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/30e58/30e58926e0e0a062dfcd5d4cb7aab7b2f5c7eff9" alt="Fig. 7: 2 x 3DRadio 433MHz telemetry antennas. Fig. 7: 2 x 3DRadio 433MHz telemetry antennas."
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a5af5/a5af5b1790976471a03eddd1c03a9732fbd0dce3" alt="Fig. 8: 2 x 3DRadio 433MHz telemetry antennas. Result: Fig. 8: 2 x 3DRadio 433MHz telemetry antennas. Result:"
Right now I wish I paid more attention at the Microwave course at school. We also had a class for antennas, but only theoretically.
Something doesn't add up. The receiver's antenna gets around -1dBm with the better antennas, but is reports -44dBm.
Discussions
Become a Hackaday.io Member
Create an account to leave a comment. Already have an account? Log In.