The simplest way to read serial data is to use Miniterm:
I have made one Serial Plotter to plot data:
CodeAnd simple Python GUI:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4f165/4f16539857912fd5db0e96268724c05fe6ad4048" alt=""
A device that measures the ambient temperature in the environment in which it is located. And displays it on the screen.
To make the experience fit your profile, pick a username and tell us what interests you.
We found and based on your interests.
The simplest way to read serial data is to use Miniterm:
I have made one Serial Plotter to plot data:
CodeAnd simple Python GUI:
Create an account to leave a comment. Already have an account? Log In.
My actual sensor 10K thermistor (unknown manufacturer). is Yes, I could measure three reference points to derive the three Steinhart-Hart coefficients. Or what calibration method do you mean?
Just use an accurate thermometer as a reference. Measure three or four temperatures, see what resistance your thermistor gives for them, and interpolate the rest. I'd bet the result would be better accuracy than using Steinhart-Hart on a generic thermistor. Or maybe compare to an LM35, checked at freezing and boiling -- those are really linear.
That's neat -- from the front it appears very organic and curvy, but from the sides you get a more angular look. I like it!
Become a member to follow this project and never miss any updates
By using our website and services, you expressly agree to the placement of our performance, functionality, and advertising cookies. Learn More
Since the two methods give you readings a couple degrees C apart, it's not clear that simply averaging them will give a better number than either one alone (which one??).
For a limited range (around room temperature), if you want accurate readings, why not forget about Steinhart-Hart or Beta and just calibrate the thing for the actual sensors you are using?