data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b461e/b461ee19181e5305d4d24c5ccb92613b590d1c2d" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3c89b/3c89b43a90f6ccee4a4e82ab39144694b08d42d0" alt=""
Anyway, I was hoping that my belt system idea would reduce the roller sides from the estimated 25mm in the concept, but that isn't the case since I needed to be able to mount to the outter carriage holes (the black bolts).
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/53b28/53b2833d8cbd12363644222a761e182f06013c92" alt=""
Part of the reason is the rail, for which I first mentally computed a solution that probably woudln't intersect the bed assembly. At least it looks more sleek and actually has a linear rail, unlike the concept model. I'm also trying a new way to do bolts in Fusion. Instead of having a file for each bolt length, have a file for the bolt head and, before importing it into the model, making a "Bolt" component. Then the head can be jointed to a part and a cylinder can be extruded to a specific length. Lastly, the body and the head component are asbuilt jointed.
Whilst computing the solution, I've established that the current order of dependencies is as follows:
- Desired X Axis length
- Roller length
- R Axis kinematics
- Y Axis kinematics
- Bed length
- Cartridge length
Discussions
Become a Hackaday.io Member
Create an account to leave a comment. Already have an account? Log In.