Jake WachlinTo evaluate the performance of this device, I started with connecting it up to a MetaShunt V2, without prior calibration of anything except the highest 2 current shunts of MetaShunt V2.
The table below compares the expected current (from the design), compared to measurements from MetaShunt V2. The images below also show these results. Overall, the expected and measured current matches very well, all within 1% or better. Future testing will show the reliability of the current supply as a reference truth.
| Expected Current | Measured with MetaShunt V2 | % Error |
| 300nA | 302nA | -0.66% |
| 3.30uA | 3.30uA | 0% |
| 30.3uA | 30.3uA | 0% |
| 300uA | 300uA | 0% |
| 3.00mA | 3.00mA | 0% |
| 30.0mA | 29.7mA | 1.0% |
| 234mA | 233mA | 0.4% |
| 389mA | 393mA | -1.0% |
Discussions
Become a Hackaday.io Member
Create an account to leave a comment. Already have an account? Log In.