Close
0%
0%

Gravity Fall

A chain-driven gravitational energy storage system that generates 13W at 58% efficiency, designed in FreeCAD and fully open source.

Public Chat
Similar projects worth following
0 followers
A gravitational energy storage system — a mechanical battery. A 15.65 kg mass descends from 1.80 m through a 1:9 chain drive, spinning a hub motor with magnetic braking. An MPPT controller regulates the output into a 12V LiFePO4 battery, with a DC-DC converter providing 5V USB output.
Key results: 13W peak output, 58% system efficiency, stable 9.5-second descent. Most interesting finding: 56% more mass produced 155% more power — non-linear optimization under load.
Honest limitations: this is a proof of concept. Charging an iPhone 16 requires 394 cycles. Prototype cost ~$860–$1,150 USD (professional fabrication), DIY replication estimated at ~$400 USD.
Next steps: reducing 41 cm dead space, replacing chains with timing belts, and automating the mass return.
All FreeCAD design files, experimental data, photos, and a complete build guide are open source on GitHub: https://github.com/valeriamayara22-eng/Gravity-Fall.
Built by high school students in Mexico City. MIT License.

What is it?

Gravity Fall is a gravitational energy storage system — a mechanical battery. A 15.65 kg mass is lifted to 1.80 m and released. As it descends through a 1:9 chain drive, it spins a multi-pole hub motor. A magnetic braking system controls the descent, an MPPT charge controller regulates the output, and the energy is stored in a 12V LiFePO4 battery. A DC-DC buck converter provides 5V USB output.

Why did we build it?

Solar and wind depend on weather. Lithium batteries degrade, require rare minerals, and produce toxic waste. Gravity is free, constant, and available everywhere. We wanted to test whether gravitational potential energy could be reliably converted to electricity using accessible components — and measure exactly how efficient the conversion is.

Key results

  • 13W peak electrical output at 1.02 N·m torque
  • 58% system efficiency (gravitational PE → electrical energy)
  • Angular velocity stabilized at maximum load, varying only 0.01 rad/s — the magnetic brake works
  • Stable 9.5-second descent time across all configurations, validated by MPPT algorithm
  • Non-linear power scaling: 56% mass increase produced 155% power increase

Honest limitations

This is a proof of concept. Charging an iPhone 16 requires 394 descent cycles. The prototype cost $15,000–$20,000 MXN (~$860–$1,150 USD) due to professional fabrication, though we estimate a DIY replication at ~$7,000 MXN (~$400 USD).

What's next?

  • Reducing the 41 cm dead space in the 1.80 m structure (30% more gravitational potential)
  • Replacing chains with timing belts to cut the 10% frictional loss
  • Automating the mass return with a winch system
  • Testing with heavier masses to map the efficiency curve further

Open source

All FreeCAD design files, experimental data (xlsx), photos, and a complete build guide are available on GitHub. MIT License.

Step by step and entire list of materials/components also on Instructables: https://www.instructables.com/Gravity-Fall-a-Mechanical-Battery-That-Converts-Gr/.

  • 1 × Wooden beams for the frame (or commission a carpenter — we did)
  • 2 × Bicycle chain
  • 2 × Large sprocket (~48 teeth)
  • 1 × Small sprocket (~5-6 teeth) — for the 1:9 ratio
  • 3 × Steel axles (12mm diameter)

View all 20 components

  • 1
    Build the Frame

    The frame needs to be:

    • Tall enough for a meaningful drop (we used 1.80 m total height)
    • Rigid enough to handle the mass without vibration
    • Perfectly vertical — any tilt causes the mass to swing

    Build a rectangular tower using wooden beams. Use bolts, not nails — you need structural rigidity. The mass will be pulling on the top of the frame during descent, so the joints need to hold.

    CRITICAL DIMENSION: Not all of your frame height is usable. The top section holds the transmission, and the bottom needs clearance. Our effective drop was 1.39 m out of 1.80 m — that's 41 cm of dead space. Minimize this. Every centimeter of height is gravitational potential energy you're leaving on the table.

    If you have access to the FreeCAD files from our GitHub, the frame_structure.FCStd file has the exact dimensions we used.

  • 2
    Install the Chain Drive

    This is the heart of the mechanical system.

    Mount the large sprocket on the descent axle (where the mass pulls). Mount the small sprocket on the motor axle. Connect them with the chain.

    The gear ratio matters enormously. We started with 1:5 — it wasn't enough. The motor needs higher RPM to generate useful voltage, and a falling mass moves slowly. The jump to 1:9 was the single most impactful design change we made.

    To verify your ratio: rotate the large sprocket one full turn by hand. Count how many times the small sprocket spins. It should be approximately 9.

    Chain tension is important. Too loose and it skips teeth. Too tight and you add friction. Chain friction accounted for about 10% of our energy losses — replacing chains with timing belts is our top recommended improvement.

  • 3
    Mount the Hub Motor and Magnetic Brake

    The hub motor is what converts rotation into electricity. We used a 36V multi-pole hub motor — the kind used in electric bicycles. The multi-pole design is critical because it generates meaningful voltage even at low RPM. A standard DC motor wouldn't work here.

    The magnetic brake is what makes this system controllable. Without it, gravity accelerates the mass and the motor spins too fast, producing voltage spikes that damage electronics.

    Position neodymium magnets near the motor's rotating element. The magnets create eddy currents that oppose the rotation — braking without physical contact. Adjust the distance between magnets and rotor to control braking force:

    • Closer = more braking = slower descent
    • Farther = less braking = faster descent

    TARGET: The mass should descend smoothly in approximately 9-10 seconds. If it drops in 3 seconds, add braking. If it barely moves, reduce braking.

    The fact that our angular velocity stabilized at 15.65 kg (varying only 0.01 rad/s) proves this braking system works. It's the result we're most proud of.

View all 5 instructions

Enjoy this project?

Share

Discussions

valeriamayara22 wrote 3 hours ago point

This is our first open-source project and we'd love to hear from this community. If you have questions, suggestions, or ideas on how to improve the system — especially on reducing friction losses or automating the mass return — we're all ears. Any feedback is appreciated.

  Are you sure? yes | no

Does this project spark your interest?

Become a member to follow this project and never miss any updates