-
Phase Two planning
08/05/2014 at 20:23 • 0 commentsPlanning for Phase Two started at about the same time as work on Phase One began.
Rather than hacking into a cell phone, it became clear that we could buy off-the-shelf M2M cell phone boards that would be easier to program and more reliable.
Several problems identified during Phase One were addressed in the Phase Two design:
- The operation of the cell phone, having been designed with a human interface, was often unpredictable. Occasionally, messages would pop up prompting a human reply (like a notification that the phone was charging). This made programming the device difficult because all of the possible messages and the timing of their appearance were not predictable. For example, at one point the devices stopped working because the cellular service provider required all of its users to upload new operating software. An appropriate user response was not possible in field-installed, pre-programmed units. Because of this problem, we adopted industry-standard M2M (Machine to Machine) methods of sending data over a cellular network. The Phase Two communications assembly, mounted externally to the nest in a 3" diameter PVC pipe anchored in a bucket of concrete, contains another custom circuit board. This "communications board" has a MSP430FR microprocessor, an RS485 transceiver, a 3.3V power supply for the microprocessor and the sensor, a switchable power supply for the phone board, and headers to plug in the M2M cell phone board.
- Text messages and disposable cell phones were not a cost-effective way to send large amounts of data. Phase Two uses FTP protocols with devices and data plans that have much less expensive data charges.
- Hacked cell phones would be difficult to produce in the quantities needed by wildlife managers, so the new design uses off-the-shelf, plug-in cell phone boards and custom circuitry that can be mass produced.
- Phase One used single-use D cell alkaline batteries. Phase Two uses rechargeable NiMH AA batteries and achieves longer battery life, as the package is carefully designed for low energy needs.
- The silicone filling the Ping-Pong balls that housed the sensors in Phase One never cured. For Phase Two, we made a casting of a Ping-Pong ball and used it to cast solid polyurethane "eggs" around the sensor circuit boards. The polyurethane is fully cured in less than a day, does not out-gas, and is very hard and durable.
- The sensors had reliability problems communicating with the cell phones because of the long distance between the sensor and the microprocessor in the Communications Unit. To correct this, a custom 1" x 1" "Smart Sensor" board was designed to include, besides the sensors, a microprocessor and an RS485 transceiver that allows reliable communication over very long cable lengths. The board and components are encapsulated in epoxy and then sealed in a polyurethane ball for environmental protection. Most of the turtle-specific calculations are now done in the Smart Sensor.
-
Phase One (2013 Turtle Season)
08/05/2014 at 20:03 • 0 commentsPhase One was a proof-of-concept field test undertaken during the 2013 turtle season. A motion-and-temperature sensor (Analog Devices ADLX362, 3-Axis, Digital Output MEMS accelerometer), soldered to a Sparkfun "breakout board," was soldered to a CAT5 cable. The board was sealed in a Ping-Pong ball by filling it with "aquarium safe" silicone caulk. The Ping-Pong ball, about the size and shape of the sea turtle eggs, was placed in the sea turtle nest by National Park Service (NPS) rangers. The other end of the cable attached to the "egg" assembly was electrically connected to a hacked cell phone that was programmed with a very small, low-powered TI MSP430 microprocessor. The phone sent out text messages with the motion and temperature data every two hours. The cell phone was protected from the elements by a communications tower made from 4" PVC pipe and pipe fittings.
Though the first device had its problems, field tests done at Hatteras in October 2013 were positive. The signal from the sensor close to a single hatchling was eight times larger than the background signal, giving hope for more extensive tests planned for 2014.