A digital clock and frequency generator based on a Symmetricom X72 Rubidium oscillator.
To make the experience fit your profile, pick a username and tell us what interests you.
We found and based on your interests.
Sheet1.pngPortable Network Graphics (PNG) - 23.05 kB - 01/25/2018 at 07:51 |
|
|
Sheet2.pngPortable Network Graphics (PNG) - 38.87 kB - 01/25/2018 at 07:51 |
|
|
Sheet3.pngPortable Network Graphics (PNG) - 35.83 kB - 01/25/2018 at 07:51 |
|
|
Sheet4.pngPortable Network Graphics (PNG) - 36.25 kB - 01/25/2018 at 07:51 |
|
|
Sheet5.pngPortable Network Graphics (PNG) - 44.65 kB - 01/25/2018 at 07:51 |
|
|
Create an account to leave a comment. Already have an account? Log In.
I have a lot of experience with FEI ex-telecom Rubidium oscillators, and none with the Symmetricom ones. So I'd be interested in hearing about any differences. But one big thing I found straight away with the FEI ones is that they have excellent long term frequency stability, but their actual calibration is usually gone. So you can't just take one and use it as the timebase for a clock without calibrating it first.
Again, the Symmetricom one may be different, but I'd still want to check its frequency against (say) GPS first. If you can calibrate it, then at that point, you'd have a very stable clock.
Become a member to follow this project and never miss any updates
Thanks for your message. To be super-accurate it probably does need calibrating, but I've found it's accurate enough for me at the moment. I'm only setting it manually anyway, and I'm manually comparing it with a GPS clock and a Colorado radio clock and it has stayed right on the dot every second. For all I know it could be several orders of magnitude away from its designed accuracy, but that's fine for now.