Close
0%
0%

SpryDrive

An affordable quasi-direct drive (QDD) actuator with steel gears.

Similar projects worth following
SpryDrive is an affordable actuator based on the quasi-direct drive (QDD) scheme. It is composed of a brushless outrunner motor, a low-cost metal gearbox, and a 3D-printed housing. Inspired by Gabrael Levine's OpenTorque actuator, but takes up less volume. The lower cost of the smaller bearing makes up for the added cost of the steel gears.

Output Backlash: ~0.13 degree

Gear Ratio: 7:1 (Can easily be modified to 3:1, 4:1, 5:1, 9:1, or 10:1).

Motor: Herlea X8318S or Turnigy 9235

See the Github page for instructions, BoM, and CAD.

LaserCut.dxf

AutoCAD DXF - 469.33 kB - 02/05/2020 at 04:49

Download

SpryDrive BoM.xlsx

sheet - 32.15 kB - 02/05/2020 at 04:49

Download

README.md

md - 3.81 kB - 02/05/2020 at 04:49

Download

  • Update: January 2020

    Ben Bokser01/24/2020 at 03:55 0 comments

    I'm now using aluminum adapters to transfer torque between the motor and sun gear as well as the carrier and output plate. This will allow the actuator to bear the stress of high-torque applications.

    As far as custom metal parts go, these are dirt cheap. I purchased them from SendCutSend for a total of $29 with free shipping. I did have to tap the output plate adapters, though. Despite the low precision of laser cutting, concentricity tolerance isn't an issue as the sun gears are already mounted and centered on the 3 mm motor shaft tip. They also don't add backlash, as they're press fitted.

    Also, vent holes for better cooling, especially if paired with a fan.

    After finally getting around to running a few more tests (I've been busy with other life stuff), I'm now satisfied enough with the design to release it:

    https://github.com/LocknutBushing/sprydrive

    Instructions and BoM coming soon. Please critique!

    In this video, I tested for 33 Nm, but theoretically the motor should be able to go much higher.

    I also tested backlash. Should be roughly 0.13 degrees, or about 8 arcminutes. 

  • Test #2

    Ben Bokser11/17/2019 at 22:35 1 comment

    New and improved design. This iteration is 3 mm shorter than the previous. 

    I'm still getting some slight, unbalanced stiction when playing with the mechanism by hand, until it's connected to the motor. Once it's all fastened together the motion feels perfectly smooth, which is odd to me. My only guess is that the bearing support the motor provides to the sun gear is enough to fix whatever axial misalignment there is, so it's a non-issue...?


  • Test #1

    Ben Bokser11/17/2019 at 22:29 0 comments

    First test of the actuator. It was a bit wobbly; I had to adjust some tolerances afterwards.

View all 3 project logs

Enjoy this project?

Share

Discussions

Colby Johnson wrote 05/01/2021 at 00:12 point

I love what you are doing here. I am making a brushless axial flux motor where the goal is minimal thickness and a high power to weight ratio. I think it might have a use in robotics, but I have thought of a thin gear reduction as a way to turn it into a hub motor too. Excited to see where this goes, and may incline me to pursue robotics in the future :)

  Are you sure? yes | no

Daren Schwenke wrote 09/23/2020 at 07:41 point

Thank you for the Like!  

I actually thought long and hard about using this particular motor to direct drive an 8in mountain board wheel.  In the end the efficiency gains of using a low ratio (3:1) planetary basically steered me away to the point of never trying it.

If you ever want to do some serious gear reduction in a small space check out #MPRT - Modified planetary robotics transmission 

Your current take on this is really good like it is though, especially if you want to do fast motion or joints that can be back driven for robotics. 

Cheers. 

  Are you sure? yes | no

Igor Fabo wrote 06/14/2020 at 06:40 point

Very nice actuator, I don't hear any noise from the motor, can you share the odrive parameters, like resistance, inductance and so on?

  Are you sure? yes | no

Ben Bokser wrote 08/01/2020 at 01:12 point

Thanks. The 8318 and 9325 motors are both rated for 0.055 ohms. Not sure about the inductance, though. https://hobbyking.com/en_us/9235-100kv-turnigy-multistar-brushless-multi-rotor-motor.html

  Are you sure? yes | no

Benjamin wrote 03/22/2020 at 14:41 point

Do you know the approximate weight of the completed actuator?

  Are you sure? yes | no

Similar Projects

Does this project spark your interest?

Become a member to follow this project and never miss any updates