A low-cost, high-quality tape recorder with a cross-board architecture.
To make the experience fit your profile, pick a username and tell us what interests you.
We found and based on your interests.
It take time to minimize dropout on 2 layer's board.
Voltage sensors use an optical pair and a moving shadow. The position of the shadow changes the amount of light passing through the phototransistor. As a result, the collector current is proportional to the absolute position of the tape tensioner.
The final version of the counter is on the image below. With the size of the PCB and components (most of 0805) this is the best layout for the two layers board
The power wiring is far from the perfect but acceptable for this case
The counter board looks like on the image below.
Back side on the next image
A wonderful counter project is described by the author on his page.
http://leoniv.diod.club/projects/audio/e-004/e-004_counter/e-004_counter.html
I'm planning the following changes to his design:
The board assembly with servo motor and mounting bracket is shown in the figure below. There are a total of three such motors in the tape recorder.
The final solution of the servo motor control board is based on the following solutions.
Despite the simplicity of the board, I performed a PI/SI simulation to evaluate the result.
If 32 pin connectors are used, the pins will be more than sufficient. I assume to divide all pins into three groups.
In addition to components for generating control signals, the motherboard has its own set of relays for switching specific signals of the tape recorder.
For example HF bias generator. It does not use -15V however its pin-out in the power supply section is the same as all other boards.
A board from another developer uses a three-pin connector. This is a very simple and inexpensive solution. The pin-out of the connector is shown below.
The motor stops by itself when the marker reaches the optical sensor.
The disadvantages of this are:
Solution 1 - With RS485
For more complete control you can use RS485 interface. Then there will be a pinout.
However, this will require a microcontroller and interface converter to be installed on the board. This makes the construction more expensive.
Solution 2 - With I2C
It will be a little cheaper if you use I2C interface.
Solution 2 - Passive
In this case only the motor driver is installed on the board. Then the pinout will be as follows.
Conclusion
Tough choice considering the connectors and wires cost their money too. However, the RS485 option looks like the most noise-protected and therefore reliable option.
Create an account to leave a comment. Already have an account? Log In.
Become a member to follow this project and never miss any updates