Close
0%
0%

Car alarm secure remote with nRF24LE1

My car's alarm remote went dead. Now is the opportunity to implement a safer and more reliable remote for it using nRF24LE1.

Similar projects worth following
The alarm that came with my car used a standard encoding chip MC145028 with fixed code and modulated at 433Mhz. This is pretty simple but also very unsafe.
I was able to capture the RF signal using a SDR dongle and easily decoded the remote's code.
This is not security in my point of view.
So I planned on using two nRF24LE1 modules, one on the remote and one on the car, connected to the alarm.
They use the 2.4Ghz band that might be a bit crowded and doesn't allow for a big range but in this case I don't pretend to have a huge range.
The announced 100 meters in LOS is more than enough. This also prevents from unwanted activation/deactivation from accidental button presses on the remote.
This way I can implement rolling code feature and also AES encryption (already in a library on the SDK) in a very easy manner.

I bought two modules from eBay, one for the remote control as transmitter and one as the receiver in the car, connected to the alarm.

To program them I had to find a programmer. As they are a bit pricey I thought of building one myself. But It was getting a bit of a pain and meanwhile I found a guy on the net that was using the Raspberry Pi to program them. I got mine out of the box and got installing the necessary stuff.

Then I connected a module to it (will update with schematic). It uses an SPI interface to download the binary code to the module. Got an example code compiled, downloaded and voila!!!

Got a led blinking! The hardware "Hello World" :D

Now for some real fun stuff.

  • 2 × nRF24LE1 RF modules
  • 1 × Raspbery Pi To program the RF modules
  • 1 × Car alarm
  • 1 × remote case
  • 1 × Led, resistor, push-button, CR2032 battery holder and battery. Misc components.

  • It's working!

    Rui Rex08/26/2015 at 14:29 0 comments

    I've assembled the last bits and it's working! :)

    First I've cut the power and data lines on the RF module of the alarm so it won't draw unnecessary current and to allow the new module to drive the microcontroller input pin.

    Then soldered the Groung, +5V and data wires to the corresponding places. The power pins on the capacitor at the output of the regulator and the data on a via near the PIC.

    Lastly I've glued the wires to the board with hot glue so they wont get easily disconnected.

    After this I assembled it on the car and voila! It works.

    But then I found that only one of the signalling light output relay is working! Forgot that this gone bad just before the RF module gave away. And worst, it's the driver side that gone bad so it's harder to see when it received the command signal. I'll address this later.

    The main issue that I found (and I was sort of expecting this but hoping it won't be an issue) is that the range s#cks! It's 1, 2 or at best 3 meters, depending on the angle horizontally and vertically. This is because the receiver sits inside the dashboard and the doors shield the signal. Because the cable is a bit short I can't rise it more (my fault!) but I'll get an extension or solder a new one. I'll try to put it on top of the cluster, this way I'll get a clear view of it from almost all angles and maybe this will solve the problem. Must make some tests.

    I'm evaluating the possibility of discarding the microcontroller on the alarm board and all the remaining circuitry (ultrasound drivers, etc) and connect the Nrf pins to the relay driver and implement the alarm functions on it. This because the standby current is about 20mA! This is way too much for me. I suspect that replacing the 7805 for a more efficient DC/DC converter will make this better but if I get the PIC out it would be even better :)

    P.S. 1 Lacks a video of it working. I'll address that soon...

    P.S. 2 The key fob has arrived! Must have a look at it.

  • Until the new key fob arrives...

    Rui Rex08/19/2015 at 09:18 0 comments

    Until the new key fob arrives I assembled the receiver and managed to get the transmitter board inside the old remote.

    I've repurposed the existing button and the led to make the remote work.

    The original setup uses 2 CR2032 lithium bateries. As I only need one, I removed the other and tighten up the contacts and found enough room to fit the Nrf24LE1 board! Yes!

    It's a (very) tight fit but it holds :)

    I've made a simple test with the receiver and it works. Now I have to connect it to the alarm. It's a more sensitive operation as I use the car almost every day and can't mess this up or the car wont start :).

    Added two connector ports, one for normal use and one for programming in case I want to make a firmware upgrade :)

  • New Key Fob

    Rui Rex07/23/2015 at 13:19 0 comments

    I was navigating through ebay and I remembered that there are a replacement key fobs that are really cheap and would be perfect for my project!

    This way I didn't need to design a new box or fit the electronics on the old remotes!

    And more! I can make a copy of the ignition key and get a identical setup to the more modern versions!

    Here's a photo of it:

    I don't need the 3 buttons but I'll find a use for the trunk one :) panic button maybe?!?

    My setup uses only one button as the alarm only uses one signal line for the open and close command. Maybe later I'll change the alarm microcontroller and make my own version... but for now this is the way :)

  • Power considerations part 2

    Rui Rex07/08/2015 at 09:13 0 comments

    My estimates (by thumb rule) where a bit pessimist.

    So, I got an average of 6mA standby current on the receiver module and only 2.6mA active current on the transmitter! This enables a much longer battery life!

    The receiver standby current:

    The transmitter active current:

    P.S. don't mind the dusty multimeter :) It's been a while since he was last used.

  • All about power...

    Rui Rex07/01/2015 at 08:29 0 comments

    Running the modules at full speed (16MHz) and adding the current consumption of the radio blocks on the TX and RX modules I noticed that the receiving will cause a lot of battery drain:

    RX: ~13mA (radio) + ~9mA CPU = ~22mA

    TX: ~11mA (radio) + ~9mA CPU = ~20mA

    So I've dropped the CPU frequency to 1MHz and "PWMed" the radio block disabling it for a period of time (around 150ms) and enabling it for a short period (~50ms). This will enable a power saving around 75% on the radio alone. The CPU will drop to around 1mA making the total current of :

    RX: ~4mA (radio) + ~1mA CPU = ~5mA

    This is more acceptable.

    The 12V rail current drain will be even lower as the switch mode power supply will draw less than that from the 12V.

    I'm going to make some real measurements and post them here.

    On the TX side I've also applied this power saving scheme but I had to apply less "off time" to avoid having to press the button a long time for the receiver to acknowledge the signal. It's about 33% off time. but I'll also try to lower the TX power so I can get aditional savings.

    TX: ~8mA (radio) + ~1mA CPU = ~9mA

    A CR2032 battery has around 240mAh of capacity so this results in 26hours of remote module autonomy.

    Assuming a average button press of around 3 seconds (will be lower than that but still) this gives an autonomy of 31200 button presses.

    No problem here, I gess :)

  • Houston, we have touchdown

    Rui Rex06/15/2015 at 12:19 0 comments

    Based on the code used on the key fobs from this site: http://store.diyembedded.com/index.php?main_page=product_info&products_id=31

    I've compiled the code, sent it to the modules and voilá! I can decode the keys sent.


    The keys are emulated by the Pi's GPIO's. I've used one pin as output for the transmiter and one as input for the receiver. This way I can change the state of the tx pin and see if the rx pin changed as well. This way I can check remotely if the code and the modules are running as planned.

    Also, I'm sending the battery voltage on the data frame. This way I can get a warning from the car when the voltage gets too low.

  • First step (part two)

    Rui Rex05/26/2015 at 08:21 0 comments

    Now connect the two modules to the Raspberry Pi.

    I'll make a diagram of the connections but meanwhile I'll leave the list of connected pins (this module uses the 32 pin version):

    nRF24 - Raspberry GPIO

    FCSN (P1.1) - 8

    FMISO (P1.0) - 9

    FMOSI (P0.7) - 10

    FSCK (P0.5) - 11

    PROG - 24

    RESET - 25

    Finally, the GND and 3.3v and that's it.

    Also, on the Raspberry, download the necessary libraries, SDK and some examples:

    This page has the necessary information although some bits are not quite well explained but you can get the big picture:

    http://sysmagazine.com/posts/210974/

    nrf24le1-libbcm2835

    Also has a code example "led_delay" that will blink a led on pin P0.0. This helps to test the programmer and then compilation platform.

  • First step: Building a test platform.

    Rui Rex05/25/2015 at 10:59 0 comments

    Solder some wires to the modules so that I can connect them to the Raspberry Pi to upload some magic code!

    (having some issues with image upload...)

View all 8 project logs

  • 1
    Step 1

    Solder wires to the modules so they can be programmed.

  • 2
    Step 2

    Connect the modules to the Raspberry Pi.

  • 3
    Step 3

    Setup the programming environment on the Raspberry.

View all 7 instructions

Enjoy this project?

Share

Discussions

mahesh wrote 01/04/2018 at 16:25 point

and here's the pinout to connect the nRF24LE1 board in this project to an Arduino for programming. see https://raw.githubusercontent.com/mahesh2000/nrf24le1_wiring/master/small%20green%20nRF24LE1%20IR%20LED%20board2.png

  Are you sure? yes | no

mahesh wrote 11/27/2016 at 23:43 point

Arduinos are cheaper than RasPis and can also be used as programmers for the nRF24LE1. see https://hackaday.io/project/5794/instructions. the wiring diagram is below:

  Are you sure? yes | no

Rui Rex wrote 01/04/2018 at 16:57 point

Thanks! 

Now with the Pi Zero price isn't so much of an issue but yes, it's a bit cheaper.

What about the arduino code used to upload the hex file?

  Are you sure? yes | no

Similar Projects

Does this project spark your interest?

Become a member to follow this project and never miss any updates